Theme Park Insider

The BLOG FLUME - Non-Disney Edition


Another vital sign flatlines in the quest for high speed rail in Florida, the Mummy is getting a reaction and things at Universal Creative aren't so dire... just like I said!

By Kevin Baxter
Posted via 172.199.175.69 on May 25, 2004 at 3:43 AM (MST)
Statements below are the work of their authors and not necessarily the opinion of Theme Park Insider.

LOW-SPEED RAIL
Orlando Sentinel - May 18

The Florida High Speed Rail Authority needs money if it expects to finish the Tampa-to-Orlando line by the mandated 2009 finish date. Of the $2.6 billion the Authority needs, they have already raised a whopping $.3B. Smirk. Without state funding, even supporters of the line don't see a rosy future for the line. Even if the Authority can raise the money, the Bush that isn't busy covering up occurrences in Iraq is busy getting signatures for a repeal, which might be successful if Disney's kidnapping of the process is focused upon.


MUMMY'S DAY
Orlando Sentinel - May 23

Universal Studios Florida's Revenge of the Mummy is getting some online love. Of course, it isn't getting one percent of the love the news media showed the opening of the Tower of Terror or Mission: Space, but it is a start. Unlike the LA Times, the Sentinel apparently has a "professional" ride critic who reviews EVERY ride that opens in the country. (Funny this is the first I have seen this guy on the Sentinel's site, isn't it?) Anyhow, his review of Mummy isn't as glowing as Joe's review but he does call it a "nice addition" to the park. Like Joe's review, he does seem to agree that certain things need tweaking. The best line? After commenting on Mummy's paltry pricetag of $40M (or so) in comparison to Mission: Space's $100M, he says, "Universal got much better bang for the buck. And unlike Mission: Space, people are much less inclined to vomit after riding the Mummy." He adds, "if you consider only the rides, Universal always has topped Disney and the Mummy only continues that trend." Truer words were never spoken.


RIGHTY MCRIGHTERSON
Jim Hill Media - May 24

After making a big deal about the layoffs of Universal Creative staff, Jim Hill has learned that not everybody was given the heave-ho, as I suspected. It wasn't just the pencil pushers left behind, but the "heavy hitters" which I also suspected. In fact, as I stated elsewhere, Universal just let the unnecessary ones go until the next project. EXACTLY like Disney does. Why wasn't this brought up?

This is the second time recently I have ragged on Jim, and I'm not trying to be mean. We all have our little roles to play. Al Lutz is the cynic. I'm the know-it-all jerk. And Jim is the one who likew to create controversy. (I guess Robert is the true professional of the bunch, though he is a bit of a wraith at times.) Controversy isn't a bad thing - I use it often to liven up the Flume - but I think Jim often creates controversy where there really isn't any. In my column, any controversy I create can immediately be confronted by our many readers. Jim's site doesn't allow an immediate answer to anything he raises, meaning columns like the recent Universal Creative "layoffs" column sit there until they are refuted days later. Jim has stated repeatedly how he doesn't like having a whole site with his name on it, and I can feel for him. I haven't been fond of having my name all over this site at times and I have really thick skin.

Anyhow, the recent success of the Revenge of the Mummy ride at USF has apparently made the suits at GE and NBC take notice. Rumor has many of the recently dismissed UC contract workers coming back soon for upcoming attractions at the stateside parks as well as the proposed Shanghai park. I say, get them to work IMMEDIATELY on something for Islands of Adventure!

Comments:


From Robert Niles
Posted via 144.142.21.5 on May 27, 2004 at 4:11 PM (MST)
Does this mean I get one of those really cool, really loud horses?

From Kevin Baxter
Posted via 172.198.28.62 on May 28, 2004 at 2:37 AM (MST)
Yeah, I comment on your occasional vanishing act and then you are all over the place. Thanks! :-)

From Robert Niles
Posted via 209.178.140.198 on May 28, 2004 at 8:47 AM (MST)
Hey, sometimes I gotta take the ring off.

And let's talk about vanishing acts, shall we? ;-)

From Kevin Baxter
Posted via 172.195.56.26 on May 28, 2004 at 2:41 PM (MST)
I didn't vanish.... I was, um, creating a need for my writing, which you can see happened with the Shrek 2 firestorm. Yeah, that's it.

E-mail this page



Search Theme Park Insider

News, Video and Live Updates

Facebook YouTube Twitter RSS Newsfeed E-mail Newsletter

Reader Reviews, by Theme Park

United States Top 10 *

International parks

Readers' Top Themed Rides

Top Roller Coasters

Top Live Shows

Top Movies/Animated Shows

Theme Park Reviews, Features, Advice

Theme Park News Archive

2014

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr.

2013

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2012

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2011

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2010

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2009

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2008

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2007

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2006

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2005

Dec.

2004-2005

Staff column archive