|
Front Page > Staff Columns
The BLOGFlume—What’s New?Busch makes additions, and Sky High flies higher than expected.
By Russell Meyer More Changes at Busch In my last column, I reported about Busch’s decision to end the runs of two of its most popular live shows before the end of the season, Imaginque and Irish Thunder. After taking a weekend visit to the park, I was able to find out some more changes to the park, and discover a big change coming to every Busch park in the country. Every Busch park currently has a Budweiser Beer School, and all but one of the parks, Busch Gardens Williamsburg, has a hospitality house. It appears that every Busch park will also be getting yet another beer-themed attraction. The recently debuted Anheuser-Busch Brewmasters Room, which was first started at Sea World Orlando, takes the idea of a beer tasting to a new level. The A-B Hospitality areas offer guests a chance to sample two 8-oz beverages, which run the gamut of Busch brands. In the Budweiser Beer School, guests sample a predetermined set (4-6) of smaller samples (1-2 ounces) of A-B products always including a fresh Budweiser, a not-so-fresh Budweiser, and Bud Light. This new beer experience is more like a wine tasting than anything else. Guests are asked to select from four different “flights” of beer covering just about every type of beer that is served on tap at Busch Gardens. Progressive Tasting—this was the one my wife and I tried, and includes the largest number of beers to try. The flight begins with the 3 primary Budweiser beers (Bud Light, Budweiser, and Budweiser Select), continues with Michelob Amber Bock, and concludes with Bare Knuckle Stout. Gourmet Tasting—my friend went with this one, and features A-B’s European-style beers. The flight begins with the 3 main Michelob beers (Michelob Ultra, Michelob Light, and Michelob) and concludes with World “Lager.” (The “select” has been changed to avoid confusion with the new Budweiser Select) Family Tasting—This flight includes the entire Budweiser family with Bud Light, Budweiser Select, Budweiser, and B to the E. Full-Bodied Tasting—This flight had the fewest number of samples, with just Michelob Amber Bock and Bare Knuckle Stout tastes. Not only does this new beer experience offer guests a wide variety of options, it also had a classiness that one would not expect from a beer tasting. The Brewmasters Room is located in the Festhaus in what used to be the “tap room,” which was only used on high capacity days for speedy beer service. Each group is situated at tables of 3-6 with a cast member assigned to each table. The cast member acts as your “sommelier,” for lack of a better term, as you progress through your flight. Guests are told a little bit about each beer, which is somewhat repetitive from the Beer School script, but are told to treat the beer like a fine wine by swirling, smelling, and tasting. Guests are also offered different foods for pairing with their beers, which are brought to the group on small plates. Each plate included: grapes, strawberries, wheat crackers, rye crackers, dark chocolate, and Swiss and cheddar cheeses. The one-on-one time with the highly trained cast member made the tasting a first-class experience. Our cast member told us that she had to travel to St. Louis for training a pass a comprehensive 200 question test in order to work in the Brewmasters Room. Not only did you receive individual attention, but I also felt like I could ask the cast member any question and get an intelligent response. From what our cast member told us, Sea World Orlando has been offering this high-class experience for a couple of months, and August Busch, after a visit to the park a few months ago, asked the Williamsburg park to add a similar experience. After the boss’s visit on a Monday, the Brewmasters Room was open for guests that Friday. Now that’s what I call a rapid response. It seems that this trend is sweeping the country, as every Busch park will be offering this new experience in the next month. The seating in the Brewmasters Room is extremely limited, about 15-20 per seating, and early reservations are required. On this visit to Busch Gardens, we also took advantage of some of the new platinum passholder perks. Platinum members are now permitted to enter the park an extra 30 minutes before everyone else at 9:00 AM to ride Loch Ness Monster. There’s not much else to do for those 30 minutes, but it was nice to ride Nessie a few times and grab a nice breakfast at Squires Galley before the other countries opened at 10:00. Platinum passholders are also offered early seating for Imaginique, and enter the theater at the same time as those who purchased the Imaginique Dinner. We also took our first opportunity to try the LeMans Bistro. This new restaurant is Busch Gardens’ first attempt at a table service restaurant. The menu features a number of appetizers, salads, entrees, sandwiches, and desserts. The food is of slightly higher quality than the normal counter-service restaurants, but the prices are reasonable. Most of the main menu items varied from $7-$10 with our final bill, including an appetizer of onion petals, a chicken salad croissant, and a tomato tortilla chicken Caesar salad wrap, coming in at just under $20. Also, as per the bill, it is their pleasure to serve us, and no tipping is required. The restaurant has an open-air location, which was not very advantageous with today’s rain, but the staff was making the best of it, offering prompt service with a smile. The restaurant seats guests until 4:00 PM, which may change after Imginique is done in August (the restaurant serves as the Imginique Dinner venue in the evenings). While it’s not anywhere close to a table-service restaurant at a Disney park, it does offer a nice experience at reasonable prices. It seems that Busch is trying hard to do the “little things” to give park guests a more personal experience, and we may see some more of these perks and “individual” additions in the near future. In another bit of BGW news, the new park maps are advertising Howl-O-Scream as running from September 16 through October 30 this year. Sky High While it didn’t debut at number one at the box office this weekend, Disney’s newest movie, Sky High, did exceed analysts expectation by earning $14.6 million. I’ve read some great reviews of this movie, and I’m still kicking myself for sitting through a screening of the pitiful Must Love Dogs in lieu of the kiddie super hero flick. The Disney movie was topped this weekend by the surprising and hilarious Wedding Crashers and the just-plain-weird Charlie and the Chocolate Factory, but performed admirably as the highest-ranking new release. While Disney will probably not have another Pacifier on their hands, Sky High is giving Disney a legitimate theater presence in a month where just about every film performs lower than expected (Stealth joins The Island as yet another $100+ million action flop). Sky High is probably not going to be Disney’s box office savior, but it does make up for some disappointment from Herbie: Fully Loaded. It looks like Disney will probably not increase its revenues over last year, especially without a Pixar release on the schedule, but its movie revenues should outpace losses for the year. Comments:From Jason Jackson
I loved the Brewmaster's Room as well. I just wanted to sit in the luxurious leather chairs for ever! The apparently spent a lot of money in putting this showcase room together in a week. With the warm wood, soft lighting, candles and leather chairs...what more could you ask for (besides free beer and snacks!) It is ashame that BGW losts its Hospitality Center to a brewery expansion a few years back. It was always fun to ride the monorail to the brewery hospitality center and go through the Brewery. Posted via 68.0.19.245 on July 31, 2005 at 10:15 PM (MST)
From Kevin Baxter
There's a typo in your column, Russell. In describing Wedding Crashers you typed "hilarious" when the correct spelling is "wretched". Clearly Vince Vaughn thought it was "hilarious" as you could tell he was enjoying every mediocre adlib far more than any of us in the audience ever could.Posted via 67.124.11.5 on July 31, 2005 at 11:56 PM (MST) As for Disney finishing off the year well... we'll see. Except for The Pacifier so far everything Disney has released this year has either lost money, or broken somewhere in the area of even. This summer sure hasn't helped a fairly poor spring - Herbie got $60M which is almost exactly its production and marketing budget; Dark Water has limped to $23M; Cinderella Man made $60M on an $88M budget (which was split with Universal); and Shark Boy and Lava Girl flopped all over the place at $38M. And Sky High's opening weekend and middling reviews mean it will probably make back its money, but not much beyond that. So Disney is relying on Chicken Little and Narnia to make some money this year (I'd include Valiant but Ben's review doesn't seem promising). Both should easily cross the $100M mark, but that would probably just cover their budgets. These two need to both be huge to make Disney's year. If one collapses, there is no way the other can ever make up enough to cover it. I don't expect major writeoffs from Disney this year, but there aren't going to be a lot of dollars for the Xmas office parties at the various Disney studio branches.
From Russell Meyer
Wedding Crashers does appear to be a "love it or hate it" kind of movie, and unlike you, I couldn't stop laughing at Vince Vaughn. I've never been a big Owen Wilson fan, I cannot stop wanting to pay for him to get a nose job, and while his character is nothing new, it doesn't detract from Vaughn's craziness. Very few films have debuted out of the top spot to eventually lead the box office two weeks after its original release, one other huge comedy comes to mind, There's Something About Mary. Posted via 209.86.122.188 on August 1, 2005 at 7:32 AM (MST)
From Jason Lester
I thought Wedding Crashers was the funniest movie this year. Better then other crap comedies like Guess Who and A Lot Like Love. At least this one has some raunchiness and nudity, the things I expect from a comedy like WC. I loved it frankly.Posted via 207.200.116.74 on August 1, 2005 at 10:25 AM (MST) I'm suprised at Sky High. I knew the top two would be WC and Charlie although I thought Charlie would be in top spot. I'm happily suprised about Crashers taking first. But I though Stealth would open above Sky High. Sky High had an awful trailer and Stealth seems more summer movie. I haven't seen either yet, but plan to out of curiosity. Still, 14 million is kind of a bomb for a summer movie.
From Russell Meyer
Not really for Late July/August though. August is typically the "throw-away" month for Hollywood studios. The hot summer movies are still raking it in, and most people are tired of sitting in theaters by the end of July. Kids are getting ready to go back to school, and most families are trying to get in one last summer vacation before school starts. Most studios have stuff on the shelf that's been sitting for months for a month like August (late January and February are also "throw-away" months for studios), and just throw it out there in August hoping to recoup some of their investment. 90% of August movies are loosers. I wouldn't expect much from the upcoming Dukes of Hazard either. I'm probably going to see that tonight. Posted via 209.86.122.188 on August 1, 2005 at 10:45 AM (MST)
From Jason Lester
True, but I would still expect more then $14 million. The reviews weren't to hot for both, but a lot of people don't pay attention to reviews. I do pay attention to reviews and gross. A $100 million dollar movie like Stealth making only $14 mil is a flop. If it cost around 30 then it could be forgiven, but not when it cost $100 million. Posted via 66.214.87.109 on August 1, 2005 at 10:23 PM (MST)
From Kevin Baxter
"Funniest movie of the year" is like saying "Best tasting dog poop of the day!" Has there been a funny movie this year? NOT ONE. And this is definitely a "love it or hate it" movie. Metacritic's average critic grade is 64 with most being in the middle area. The non-critics are very much into love-it-or-hate-it mode. But take that with a grain of salt, because there are a lot of 10s on that list. Is this a 10 movie? Does it compare to true 10 comedies, like Mary? Hells no! Even if you thought it was funny, the clunky romantic comedy elements would make me think anyone that rated this above a 7 or so as a movie novice.Posted via 67.124.11.5 on August 1, 2005 at 11:32 PM (MST) I think the divide is one that has been in this country ever since Robin Williams became famous. How many people LUUUUUV him and how many HAAAATE him? Wackiness is often funny to some people, torture to others. Like Meet the Parents. Which is why I laughed WAY more during Mr and Mrs Smith than I did during this. (Then again, I saw that right after this, so I would've laughed at a funeral.) I'm waiting for Virgin for some real humor...
And just because you don't like it doesn't mean I don't. Everyone's entitled to an opinion. P.S. I'm not a movie novice. My whole family's in entertainment. My dad's a director, mom's a producer, uncle's a set driver, grandfather's an actor. My parents also own American World Pictures, a succesful film company. And I write screenplays. That enough credibility for you?
Get thee some Cheetos and a Netflix account instead, and we'll talk... ;-) (BTW, I'm being sarcastic, people. Really.)
I appreciate and value the classics, but also love to be entertained. What's wrong with that?
BTW, there's not a whole lot of buzz around Steve Carell's 40 Year Old Virgin, so I wouldn't be holding my breath for that one. His schtick may be getting old, especially after his ho-hum performance in Bewitched. Sad, since he was a such riot in Bruce Almighty and Anchorman. It still has a few weeks to build though, so things could change. Also, unless you can get some cheap matinee tickets, avoid the Dukes of Hazzard. It is a disgrace to the original TV show, and the acting is about as bad as it gets.
Just got back from Stealth. It deserved to bomb. What an awful movie. Don't bother with this one. I don't have one good thing to say about Stealth. Also, Virgin looks funny so I hope it does good and Carrell is very good at physical comedy, so we'll see. I for one am going to see it, but you're right, I haven't heard any buzz surrounding it.
I've seen a limited amount of buzz on Virgin also, but the studio seems to be pretty happy with it (not that this is worth much). His name has just been added to the list of rumored contenders for the role of Joker in the next Batman film. Not sure i see him in the role myself, and he has some stiff competition.
As for being in a family with a film background, that does disqualify you. If movie people had any taste, wouldn't ALL of our movies be good? Instead of having well over half sucking something severe? Look at Drew Barrymore's lineage. Has she had good taste when it comes to movies? Look at how long Stanley Kubrick was in film, and how many classics he created, yet his final film was the embarrassing Eyes Wide Shut. Even Steven Spielberg, one of the greatest directors of our time, not only "admires" Michael Bay, but handed him the script to The Island! The only thing that impresses me is someone who has seen hundreds and hundreds of movies. All kinds, all genres, all languages.
And in regards to Dukes, it wasn't as bad as everyone says. Granted, it was pretty bad, but nowhere near Stealth level. At least I didn't want to go to sleep in DOH.
On a different note, I saw Sky High earlier this morning. It was better then I expected, actually halfway decent, but had a bad script. The only reason to go is for the adults, mainly Kurt Russell, Kelly Preston, and Bruce "Ash" Campbell, who I've always loved. If you haven't seen Evil Dead you must see it. Any fan of horror will love it.
|
Search Theme Park InsiderNews, Video and Live UpdatesReader Reviews, by Theme ParkUnited States Top 10 *
International parks
Readers' Top Themed Rides
Top Roller CoastersTop Live ShowsTop Movies/Animated Shows
Theme Park Reviews, Features, Advice
Theme Park News Archive2013Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May
2012Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2010Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2009Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2008Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2007Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2006Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2005Dec.
2004-2005Staff column archive
|
©1999-2011 Robert Niles.
"Theme Park Insider" ® is a registered trademark of Robert Niles.
About Theme Park Insider - Rules for Writing and Rating - Privacy Policy - Contact the Editor