When we finished the ride, she'd loved it - and everything had been exactly as I described it... except for that tunnel. I could have sworn that there were lights in it. Had I remembered that wrongly?
Nope. I was right, as Theme Park Insider reader Caleb Phillips reminded me when he wrote me a few days ago. Caleb, it turns out, is trying to organize an online effort to convince Busch Gardens to bring back the in-tunnel effects on the Loch Ness Monster. He's set up an online petition, which you can sign:
Several years ago Busch Gardens Williamsburg's Loch Ness Monster had special effects in the tunnel portion of the ride. These Special effects included flashes of light, mist, and also a large illuminated sea serpent (the Loch Ness Monster). Upon signing this petition you are stating your belief that the removal of these features have resulted in degradation of the overall ride expierience and would like to see such features be reinstated in the ride program.
Again, here is the link to sign the petition. Please, SeaWorld Parks & Entertainment, can your fans have this favor? Let's turn on the lights again in the Loch Ness Monster tunnel!
Tweet
Good enough for a backstory? Turn on the lights, I say.
In regards to the interlocking loops, based on the location of the loops, I think the only way to have the trains looping simultaneously would be to have 3 trains running. I think it's been quite a long time when they could justify using that many trains on Nessie. Usually when there's only 2 trains running on any roller coaster, train 2 doesn't dispatch until train 1 has hit the block brakes at the end of the ride or extremely close to. Running only 2 trains, it would be extremely rare for the second train to even be on the lift hill while another train is in the final loop. While I would love to have trains looping simultaneously, Nessie's ridership just doesn't justify it.
I have never ridden Loch Ness with the lights on and wonder what it would be like? The tunnel is already good on it's own. Hope the petiton works..
This article has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.