Sign in or Join the Community!

Theme Park Insider YouTubeFacebookTwitterInstagramGoogle+Email Newsletter
Home Park guides Hotel reviews Saving money Travel tips Community
Russell Meyer
Writer

Theme Park Tech – Water, Part 1: Liquid Propulsion

Published: February 17, 2014 at 11:44 PM

Theme park fans probably don’t spend a lot of time thinking about it, but every major theme park in the world uses water in multiple ways. The applications are actually so vast that I need to split this column into two parts to adequately cover water’s use in theme parks. From propulsion to special effects, to landscaping and ambiance, to cooling and hydration, water and other liquids are as necessary to the life of a theme park as they are to human life. This first part of my elemental series dedicated to water will focus on the use of water as a method for propulsion and motion in rides.

Aside from roller coasters, just about every major amusement park of the 20th century had some sort of flume ride. Flumes date back over 150 years, originating as a method to move heavy objects. Man has been using flowing water to move things for centuries, but the idea of creating artificially sloped “V” shaped trenches filled with running water to eliminate “log jams” is credited to James W. Haines in 1868. It took until the 1960’s before modern log flume rides were perfected, but the three main types of water rides -- Shoot the Chutes, Rapids, and Log Flumes -- all draw on technology from industrial log flumes.

DSC_0054

Modern log flumes were developed initially by Arrow Dynamics in the 1960’s, and much of the design has remained relatively unchanged. Guests ride in elongated vehicles that are typically shaped and themed to look like logs, and are pushed by water that is pumped into different parts of the course by high flow-rate pumps. Most log flumes also use some type of conveyor belt lift, and also use gravity to help propel the logs and water down the course. A majority of log flumes have some variety of drop, which creates a splash, getting guests wet. Quite a few parks have chosen to use the long course of a log flume to tell a story, and many are elaborately themed like Disney’s Splash Mountain,

DSC_0577

Knott’s Timber Mountain Log Ride, and Dudley Do-Right’s Ripsaw Falls at Islands of Adventure, quite possibly the wettest log flume on the planet.

CIMG0210

In recent years, the old-fashioned log flume has been getting some upgrades as theme parks have been merging log flume and roller coaster into what is now referred to as the water coaster. The integration of roller coaster wheels and track with standard log flume technology allowed designers to create different sensations and greater downhill speeds. Skull Mountain at Six Flags America was one of the world’s first water coasters, and while the ride no longer exists, water coasters are still being built around the world with one of the best being Journey to Atlantis at SeaWorld Orlando.

DSC_0706

Shoot the Chutes rides are some of the oldest water rides that have been developed for theme parks, and typically represent the easiest way to get wet in the theme park. Some are a simple lift hill followed by a steep, soaking drop, while other have integrated the technology into far more than a simple giant splash like Jurassic Park the Ride

SOCAL 199

and Escape from Pompeii.

DSC_0034

However, just about every one of these rides has a splash down section that not only soaks the riders, but also drenches guests watching nearby. Some of the most famous theme park rides in the world utilize technology derived from the standard flume -- for example, Pirates of the Caribbean and It’s a Small World, and while riders of these slower dark rides typically don’t get wet, water is critical to the ride’s operation. Disney is rumored to be making even more advancements with this technology for the upcoming Avatar boat ride.

DSC_0491

Rapids rides, one of the most likely places to see soaked guests in a theme park, use water as the primary source of propulsion. Rapids rides typically take up much larger footprints, require more complicated grading, and far more water than log flumes or Shoot the Chutes rides. Entering round rafts, riders are propelled down a river-like course featuring hills and rapids created by bumps and projections into the river. These rides also typically feature geysers, water canons, and/or waterfalls to ensure every guest in the raft gets equally wet. Grizzly River Run and Bluto’s Bilge Barges are two of the best and wettest rapid rides in the country.

DSC_0454

Now, using water to literally push a boat down a course using pumps or gravity is not the only way to use liquids to move ride vehicles. Hydraulics are a technology that’s been around a long time, but is relatively new to theme park attractions. Similar to pneumatics, ride vehicles can use hydraulic motors to compress hydraulic actuators to move the vehicle in different directions. Typically hydraulics are used in stationary motion simulators like Disney’s Star Tours,

DSC_0011

the former Star Trek: The Experience,

DSC_0545

and SeaWorld’s Wild Arctic. Hydraulics are used for these stationary motion simulators because the weight of the vehicles is not an issue, unlike track-based motion simulators like Transformers and the Amazing Adventure of Spider-man, which use lighter pneumatic systems.
One of the newest and most intense forms of ride acceleration using hydraulics was developed by Intamin 12 years ago, when they introduced the world’s first hydraulic launch roller coaster, Xcelerator. While the roller coaster doesn’t actually use water for its propulsion, it instead uses a high viscosity hydraulic fluid to create the 10,000+ horsepower needed to accelerate trains from zero to 82 miles per hour in a little more than 2 seconds.

SOCAL 343

What coaster enthusiasts didn’t know was that Xcelerator was just the prototype for what would eventually hold just about every roller coaster height and speed record for the past 10 years. Starting with Top Thrill Dragster in 2003 (120 MPH and 420 feet tall)

OHIO 102

to Kingda Ka in 2005 (128 MPH and 456 feet tall)

SFGAdv 020

to Formula Rosa in 2010 (149 MPH and 176 feet tall), Intamin accelerator coasters have held the record for over a decade now. In addition to using hydraulics to launch trains to insane velocities, water is now used to cool the steel cable that pulls the train down the launch track, due to incidents involving overheating and shredded cables.

So, the use of water and hydraulics to move and propel vehicles is widespread in the theme park industry. As evidenced by Disney’s recent patent filing for modifications to the standard Shoot the Chutes technology, it’s something that will continue to be used and perfected to deliver more realistic and intense experiences for guests.

Previously on "Theme Park Tech":

Replies (10)

173.189.13.52

Published: February 18, 2014 at 2:19 AM

Great story! I love most of the log flume style rides. I wish we'd see some new ones being built. It seems like a lot of them getting torn down. Flumes for 2016!
Brian Emery

Published: February 18, 2014 at 9:48 AM


Nice job.....

I enjoyed reading this while 'Working'......

24.119.81.133

Published: February 18, 2014 at 11:42 AM

This is really interesting! Water and amusement parks go hand in hand but I didn't realize how much so. I love log flume rides during those hot summer days. I think it's great that we can appropriate functional, useful things into fun and exciting pastimes.
Thanks for sharing, I look forward to part 2!
-J.R.
www.netting.com
68.58.203.160

Published: February 18, 2014 at 6:01 PM


Are "E" Ticket water rides like Splash Mountain, Grizzly River Rapids and Pirates Of The Caribbean generally considered more or less expensive to build and maintain than non-water attractions like Space Mountain, The Mummy and Spiderman?
173.189.13.52

Published: February 18, 2014 at 11:00 PM

User 68.58.203.160 had a great question. Maybe you could do a story on what costs more to build and which causes the biggest return on investment? Maybe you can do a Splash Mountain Vs. Space Mountain costs and return on investment article or something similar!
75.69.20.247

Published: February 19, 2014 at 11:04 AM

I concur with 68.58.203.160, 173.189.13.52, please do this, I would love to read it!

I would love to see an article on the economics of theme parks, you could have a whole series! ;)

.Overall economics of ride design- water vs not, enclosed vs not etc
.Economics driving a design- interview a designer about a design, and how budget impacted it (what was removed/improved/modified would be fascinating)
.Economy of spaces- optimising design of spaces for people flow/ride flow

Russell Meyer
Writer

Published: February 19, 2014 at 2:58 PM

Comparing attraction costs can be extremely difficult to do because companies are not forthcoming with specific costs of attractions. Some give out numbers, but it can be difficult to tell how much of that is real cost to design, build, and construct and how much of that is just marketing. Additionally, with parks like Disney and Universal, they have on-staff engineers that are always working on new designs and ideas (R&D) that are rarely disclosed when they talk about the cost of a ride. Also, the maintenance costs are never discussed when theme parks talk about the cost of an attraction. Having never worked in park maintenance, I have no clue how much more effort is required to maintain a water ride versus something else. Like many attractions, once it's "broken" it, and has a dedicated maintenance staff, the costs would gradually decrease over time aside from major part replacements and refurbishment.

So while it would probably be a pretty interesting column, it would be insanely difficult to pry this type of information out of a theme park. I had tried late last year to get some information from some local parks about ride evacuation procedures, and they were very hesitant to provide that, and I would expect similar hesitancy when it comes to line item operational costs.

Tim Hillman

Published: February 20, 2014 at 5:51 AM

Great article, Russell!
75.69.20.247

Published: February 20, 2014 at 9:33 AM

Thanks for the input Russell, it was by no means a critique of your excellent article. :)

Maybe something along the lines of a historical article about a ride built decades ago might be more feasible to tackle from the cost/benefit/design changes angle.

I come to this site for the high quality content here, and look forward to more excellent work from Russell (and everyone else)!

Brad Jashinsky

Published: February 20, 2014 at 10:27 PM

Russell, do you know more about the story behind Bud Hurlbut's involvement with Arrow Development on the creation of the log flume? In the book Knott's Preserved, Hurlbut is credited, along with Arrow, for the creation of the log flume concept. According to the story, Walter Knott was nervous about the safety of the brand new ride system being introduced to his guests, which is why the Knott's ride wasn't built until Arrow had successfully constructed log flumes for other parks. Have you seen that story mentioned in any other books or articles?

This article has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.

Previous article: Hong Kong Disneyland plans third hotel, following reports of record attendance and profit