Published: November 30, 2009 at 11:24 PMI still think the Marvel deal is a bigger blow to Universal than Comcast buying NBC/Universal. In fact, I venture it would be better since I am guessing Comcast has a bit more of a clue about entertainment then, well GE who is pretty much good in everything else.
There goes some of the jokes on 30 rock with Jack's microwaves!
Published: December 1, 2009 at 4:23 AMAnyone who has comcast as their cable operator (or phone & internet provider) knows they have no concept of what good customer service even is, which means any service oriented part of NBC/Universal would be a total disaster. Trust me, this would NOT be good news for the theme parks which already lag way behind Disney in customer satisfaction
Published: December 1, 2009 at 8:49 AMI agree with you on the idea of content and it's value Robert. The only issue is when television and internet (which Comcast also provides) become obsolete like the printed newspaper has. With the advent of HDTV and everything now becoming web based, it's hard to imagine that happening anytime soon.
There is a lot of money and politics involved with television, and some things would likely have to happen before TV completely goes the way of online. Those things would include regulation of the internet (please God no), and all businesses involved (tv stations, cable companies, studios, equipment manufacturers...etc) figuring a way to replace the piles of money that would eminently be lost with a simple switch to complete internet streaming.
I don't think that it's as much about "future planning" as it is about making more money while keeping their prices competitive in the present. It's fair to say that Comcast the cable company (and most other big cable companies) have hit the ceiling in terms of organic growth, and that the product can only grow by swallowing up other companies and charging their customers more. With content, Comcast has figured out a way to grow, and also to compound the money it already makes from it's product while keeping prices down. Not only does it own the content, but also the medium in which said content is distributed. If TV does become obsolete, Comcast already distributes the replacement...the internet.
Let's just hope that the theme park division is a priority, and that Comcast doesn't bring their much maligned customer service to Universal.
Published: December 1, 2009 at 10:54 AMWell what about Time Warner? They own their cable company along with the whole Warner Bros package and at one point, Six Flags.
Published: December 1, 2009 at 11:10 AMFirst off, Comcast ALREADY is a small player in the media content provider arena. They own (wholly or partly) the following E! Entertainment, Style Network, G4, Versus, The Golf Channel, AZN Television, FEARnet and a number of regional sports channels (SportsNet I believe).
Published: December 1, 2009 at 2:28 PMOh, but think of the fun Robert if a defense contractor, we can really do some upgrades to Men in Black on those guns LOL, or even a appliance maker, we can rename Storm Force to the Sit and Spin lol. Ok I had my fun, I just hope they keep up high standards or even more and continue to invest into the parks. With Steve Burke, hopefully they will.
Published: December 1, 2009 at 5:36 PMOne fear besides customer service issues would be to see it become 'Comcast Studios Resort'!
Published: December 1, 2009 at 6:32 PMIf UO management brings the Comcast brass - and their families - down for a week, they'll be on board with cultivating the parks. Having a corporate owned facility for meetings, client schmoozing, employee rewards, etc. is a huge, huge asset to any business.
Face it, a typical bigwig's kids and grandkids don't care about spending the week at some fat cat golf resort. But spending the week at Universal Orlando? (Or Disney World?) Now that's cool. Kids whine about what they don't like and gush about what they do. That influences the bosses, too.
Now, will the Comcast management team learn enough about theme parks to retain a top parks management, marketing and creative team? There's your billion-dollar-plus question.
Published: December 1, 2009 at 7:26 PM@Derek -- You wrote...
"The only issue is when television and internet (which Comcast also provides) become obsolete like the printed newspaper has."
Uhh... Derek? What do you think the HDTV and other content travels over to get to whoever's receiving it? In many cases, the Internet.
How do you think requests for web content gets to a server which supplies it? And how do you think that content comes back to the requester? That's right. The Internet.
The 'net itself, or at least the possibilities afforded by having a massive global data network, will never become "obsolete." The means we use to access it may change, what comes to us and goes from us will likely change, but the basic idea of interconnection (networking, if you like) has existed since the Stone Age, and will likely continue to exist long after we've gone to dust.
The web is merely an application running on top of the Internet, just like E-mail, instant messaging, VoIP, and all the other assorted 1's and 0's shooting all over the place (including, unfortunately, spam).
Published: December 1, 2009 at 8:10 PMI thought that I pretty much said that. The internet won't be going away, but traditional coaxial fed cable (digital or otherwise) television will eventually go away in lieu of a high speed internet connection that many of us already have. As I said though, we won't be there for a while for several reasons. Comcast widely distributes both cable tv and internet, so they have no worries about being obsolete with their medium.
Published: December 3, 2009 at 8:39 AMThe real purpose of the Comcast NBC Universal deal is the vast film library of blockbuster hits that Universal has which it can now charge fees to networks and othe cable providers.