Published: April 22, 2010 at 9:55 PMFor my money, I just don't think it gets any better than staying on property at the theme park resorts. Not only is this the most convenient option but it usually offers other perks, such as early admittance and/or extended hours for hotel guests and express lines. After a tiring day in the park, there's something to be said about a quick walk or water taxi/bus ride home to your hotel.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 4:27 AMMy financial situation sucks, so I have to stay cheap off-property. But as long as a motel has the three B's..Bed, Bath, and Bowl, I'm fine. Motel 6 is usually my choice if I can find one within 15 miles or so of a park. And I've done that for Kings Dominion, Kings Island, Busch Tampa and Williamsburg, Dollywood, Six Flags Georgia, Kennywood, Hersheypark, Lakemont, DelGrossos,Six Flags America, and others.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 5:10 AMDepends on the park really. In Orlando, I'll stay on site at Disney or Universal. I'll stay on site at Cedar Point, usually at the Breakers or Breakers express. Not a lot of parks have their own hotels, but there are fringe benefits to staying in them. If they do have a hotel on site, I'll usually take a look at those first. If they don't, I'll cash in some Choice Rewards, Marriott, or Hilton Honors points. There's usually a decent hotel by one of those companies close.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 5:50 AMHow about house/condo rental. The only reason we go every year to Disney with the extended family is because of a great 4 bedroom with pool is significantly cheaper, faster for us then waiting for a bus at the parks, much more comfortable after a long day in the parks with all the nice things like home. The kitchen stocked with breakfast goodies holds us until lunch plus saves us money and time. We now try to rent or barter a house in every city we visit.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 5:56 AMWhen traveling to theme parks I use Hotwire or Priceline as much as possible. I prefer to camp for the experience, but some camp sites can be $65 for a tent site! But, with the bid web sites I can get a 2.5 or 3 star hotel with two double beds a bathroom and free breakfast for under $60...now that is cheap. Orlando is perfect for bidding as the high number of hotels drives prices very low. For example, you can stay at the Hyatt Place on Int'l Blvd near Universal for $73 (all taxes and fees included) and you get a free hot breakfast for up to six people...now that is travel on the cheap.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 6:28 AMAt Disneyworld we stay on sight. It makes the stay so much more magical to us. At other parks we look for low cost motels for the most part. If the area has a Starwood hotel then we will go for that since I work for them.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 6:31 AMFor the PA parks, Hershey and Dorney, I'm fortunate enough that my girlfriends Aunt and Uncle live in between both of those parks, so when I go there I just stay at her relatives for free, and they cook us breakfast. Can't beat that deal. Great adventure is always a day trip for me. Busch Gardens Virginia, where ever it is decently priced will do.
When it comes to Disney though, you can't beat staying on property. Extra Magic Hours, free transportaion, free parking for resort guest, relatively close proximity to the parks given the enourmous size of the Disney compound, and pretty stellar service to boot. I stayed on site for the first time in 2001, then I went back 2 years later with my girlfriend and her family and stayed off site at a Motel 6 I believe. That was the last time I would ever do that. The difference is night and day. As of now I stay at the moderate resorts, which I find to be fairly priced considering the level of theming and amenities they provide. Ofcourse the goal is to experience some of the Deluxe resorts eventually. Maybe next stay at the world.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 7:38 AMI'm under RCI, and I stayed at a timeshare down the road from WDW (5 min) in 2006, and still would want to stay there for short vacations. If I have the chance, I'll camp out on property at the complex solo! Ha ha!
Published: April 23, 2010 at 9:24 AMOn-site at Cedar Point is great, with lots of choices of facilities and rates. My wife needs to use an electric scooter, so staying at the Breakers Hotel is really convenient. She can run it all over the park, and if she wants/needs to go back to the room to rest or cool-off (or recharge) she can do so without having to find a handicap-accessible van or bus.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 1:50 PMFor WDW, I try to stay on property, but for all other parks I do not. I don't use the WDW transportation, but I do sometimes take advantage of the extra magic early entrance to some of the parks. My favorite advantage of my on-site WDW stay last time was the WDW dining plan, which saved us some money in the long run and was way more convenient than carrying and dealing with cash. Another plus was the free parking pass for the parks. I really like the WDW hotels, although the rooms tend to be on the small side. I really loved our stays at the Animal Kingdom Lodge and the Coronado Springs Resort. The newly refurbished rooms at the Polynesian Resort are great, too, and the location is amazing for fans of the MK park.
For Universal Orlando, I found the cost of the hotels to be prohibitively high, so I have never stayed there. We checked out the Hard Rock Hotel's pool and lobby, and they looked fantastic. It was practically freezing outside but the heated pool was full of guests. looked like lots of fun. We stayed in our timeshare in Orlando for that visit.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 6:11 PMFor Orlando, we use the price of hotel rooms (off-property) along with TouringPlans.com to pick dates to visit - the room prices are pretty good estimates of crowd size. Over the past 8 years, the strategy has worked pretty well and we've had prices as low as $25/night at a Comfort Inn, with mid-30s per night most of the time.
That having been said, our last 5 or 6 trips have found us staying at Ramada Resort Main Gate West. Price has been good plus the indoor pool is wonderful for days when the weather is bad (which hasn't happened all that often). Lots of food choices along Irlo Bronson help pick the spot.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 6:32 PMWe try to stay on-site when it's available, particularly when it comes to the Disney parks, (Orlando and California). We've yet to stay on-site at Universal Orlando but we will definitely be doing that in the near future.
It adds something special when you stay on-site at the resorts. The early/late entrance and front of the line options are nice, but I love being totally surrounded by Disney/Universal when we vacation to those spots. Even when you're at the pool or in your room kicking back, there's something nice about being immersed in all of that magic.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 7:02 PMRobert, there are indeed things that are essentially time-share campsites, but I don't think they are very popular. I think the one near my house predates most timeshares.
I stayed in the Cedar Point hotel for a couple of years (breaker's express) because it was nearby and didn't cost that much. But now even booking months in advance is too expensive.
I usually stay at Country Inns, because I do this a lot and I get a lot of points which saves me money, and they have rooms with 2 queen beds in them, which means my whole family can crash somewhat comfortably.
We do timeshares as well, but I rarely stay at one resort area long enough. We did use our timeshare for Dollywood last year.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 7:06 PMI love staying on the Disney grounds. If you stay at Disney, you will not stay off property again. I have tried the off property and it is cheaper but it is day and night for the experience. I have stayed when my kids were young at the Disney and value and they are great but the moderate hotel are so much better. They have better pools and food courts. The whole experience is so much more enjoyable. I have also stayed at two deluxe hotels and that too is a difference experience.
Published: April 23, 2010 at 7:41 PMYou can not go to my opinion since my family is not a dihard themepark goer. I stay at a campground when we go down to Herseypark. The campground is Hershey owned so you can call it a on site campground. THe second themepark I go to periodicly is greatescapes. We used to stay at a hotel down the street from it but if we do it we travel to the boarder of vermont and stay with family to save money.
Published: April 24, 2010 at 5:58 AMIt's bad news for the older hotels on 192 and also I-Drive in O-Town, but if you want the best vacation experience available there is nothing like staying on-site. Disney has hotels in every price range and the value hotels are VERY competitive with the I-Drive and 192 alternatives.
If you are vacationing at USF, there is no better way to do it than to stay on-site. Between the 5 minute walk to the parks (which allows for better rest times at night) to the express feature of the room keys, there is no better value in the area.
Published: April 25, 2010 at 6:44 AMDefinitely prefer to stay on-site...if the budget permits. :) It just adds another element to the trip, like convenience and immersion in the park experience. For example, the Hardrock is so close to USF it's really convenient for Halloween Horror Nights. Disney does a better job of offering more price levels...Universal really needs to create a value to moderate level on-site property.