Published: June 3, 2010 at 2:39 PMThis is great to know, Robert. Thanks for posting!
Published: June 3, 2010 at 4:13 PMI was going to submit this as a story actually. Glad you saw it to Robert!
Published: June 3, 2010 at 7:13 PMThanks for the tip Robert!
Published: June 4, 2010 at 2:06 PMI'm interested in the math here. (I know, me being interested in math. HUGE shock...) But I wonder how much money NBC/Universal will net from additional tickets and hotel reservations from people watching this special versus additional ad revenue that Dateline would have netted for this 30-minute broadcast spot. (I presume that NBC will book some ad revenue from the Harry Potter special as well.)
If NBC ends up money ahead here, as opposed to "taking one for the team," I wonder if that might convince the Peacock to arrange more airtime for Universal theme parks, the way that ABC puts Walt Disney World on air at every opportunity. (See Extreme Makeover: Home Edition.)
Published: June 5, 2010 at 8:12 AMI miss these kind of things! I feel like new things at Disneyland/ Disney World had TV specials more often back in the 80's, but that could just be me as a kid.
Published: June 6, 2010 at 3:54 PMGetting excited to watch this in six minutes! Hope we get to see some special sneak peeks.
Published: June 6, 2010 at 5:08 PMI waited till 6 to watch this. Unfortunately there was an error on the post. It was at 5 mountain time instead of the mentioned 6. NHL started at 6 here in MST. Guess I'll have to look for it online.
Published: June 7, 2010 at 7:32 AMIt ended up starting at 8pm here in LA, due to the hockey game. I thought it was well done - straight out of the ABC/Disney corss-promotional playbook, but with a touch more geek appeal than I've seen in ABC specials on Disney theme parks. No, it wasn't made for Theme Park Insider readers (you'll learn more about the new land on our Wizarding World of Harry Potter page), but I think casual observers likely would have been impressed.
My big question continues to be: Where's J.K. Rowling? I'd think that an on-camera endorsement from her would be a huge, huge boost to the project.
Published: June 7, 2010 at 7:43 AMI had some issues with it. First and foremost, they kept on refering to it as a park and I know we all know it is but a small section of a larger themepark but I can't help but wonder if people not "in the know" may think it is something bigger than it is.
Another issue I had was a genuine lack of footage. There was more film footage than park footage. I get it, it is a sort of like a teaser to get you jazzed up. But what is more effective, hearing an actor talk about how cool a roller coaster is or I don't know, actually showing the roller coaster. I mean, I've ridden Dueling Dragons countless times, so I know what I'm store for (though I did want to see some of the theming), but the public should get at least a tiny glimpse of the coasters in action. Seriously, hearing Daniel Radcliffe talk about how close the coasters come to each other is cool and all, but a quick glimpse of the coaster in action....wouldn't that have dropped some jaws?
Just nitpicky things of course.
Published: June 7, 2010 at 7:57 AMI agree with Scott B in wanting to see more - the basic rule of "show, don't tell". The special itself wasn't advertised a whole lot, so mostly only fans of some sort would have known about it, and the delays with hockey...
Published: June 7, 2010 at 10:07 AMI agree, I wish they could have given us a glimpse (maybe a second or less of footage) of some of the attractions, or even the exteriors but from angles that you can't see on foot?
And I'm not sure if I was seeing things, but was the footage of the indoor parts of Hogwarts and other sets from the movie created digitally for the fly throughs?