Published: October 1, 2010 at 1:21 AMMy vote goes to King Kong since it doesn't duplicate anything already in Orlando, such as Transformers does for Spider-Man and Madagascar does (to a lesser degree) Popeye's Bilge-Rat Barges. A pair of dueling coasters of different types in somewhat novel, but Dueling Dragons, or whatever its called in its current HP incarnation is already in attendance. This only leaves the fairly generic Space Fantasy, and that will surely come up short compared to the indoor spinning coaster sure to come to Disney's Hollywood Studios in the next few years. For that reason, King King seems to be the sure bet for novelty.
Published: October 1, 2010 at 10:27 AMI've seen a video of the Space Fantasy ride and I have to say I was deeply impressed so I voted for that. It would bring something totally different to Orlando - all the other options are just upgrades of existing attractions, apart from King Kong which is not raelly enough to warrant a stand-alone attraction.
Published: October 1, 2010 at 3:44 AMI voted for Madagascar because it is the one I am most interested in, although it was a vote I had to think about because I think all of the attractions are ones I'd be glad to see come to Orlando. I like the BattleStar Galactica concept a lot because it's a family coaster and a more intense coaster..... but since they already have dueling coasters at IOA, I doubt they'd bring it. I also liked the Space coaster idea, although since there is a space mountain (I know, it's less intense probably and does not spin.... ) Orlando seems to have the space theme more than covered. I think I am just interested to see the Madascar ride.... I have not seen anything like it from Universal that I know of (it would be a great competitor with Disney since most anyone probably could ride it and enjoy and it may be very detailed in the props or scenes). I also would be interested in knowing if there would be any little drops or anything in it (maybe something like a much better Maelstrom at Epcot).
Published: October 1, 2010 at 5:05 AMI voted for King Kong. The old ride used to be one of my favourites in Universal Studios and should never have been removed in the first place. Based on a classic film, it will never grow old and even if the studios did want to alter it in the future, they would only need to alter the movie being played and the ride sequence for a totally different experience. Bring back my gorilla.
Published: October 1, 2010 at 8:09 AMI voted Transformers because I can't get enough of those kind of rides.
Published: October 1, 2010 at 11:06 AMi like something different, so i chose the Galactica attraction....and UNIVERSAL ORLANDO had a KING KONG attraction that was AWESOME! 2 bad it no longer exists!
Published: October 1, 2010 at 2:51 PMHere's how I break this down:
Madagascar (my pick): This brings to the table the one thing that Universal doesn't have in Orlando - a family water dark ride. Theme parks can't get enough no-height-limit, narrative attractions that appeal to all ages. Madagascar - if it ever opens - could do that. Yes, this ride loses points for its delayed opening, but I suspect that Universal Orlando might have the experience to manage this project to completion better than USS has.
Space Fantasy: The Ride: Universal doesn't have an indoor coaster, either - a strong asset in Orlando's hot, humid weather. (Update: OK, Revenge of the the Mummy. See below.) Space Fantasy's gotten rave reviews and the fact that it actually works might push it to the top pick.
Transformers: Great franchise. Sounds like a great tech upgrade to Spider-Man. And maybe it need to replace Spidey, too. (See my post in August about Universal and Disney and Marvel.) But it's not different enough from Spider-Man to beat out my top two.
King Kong 360/3-D: Big drop off to this point. Yes, it's a great experience. But while it works well within the context of Hollywood's Studio Tour, the Kong show is too short to stand on its own in Orlando. It'd need a new treatment - to the point where we really would have to consider it a new attraction, not a duplicate of one from another park.
Battlestar Galactica: Universal Orlando doesn't need another roller coaster that doesn't work.
Published: October 1, 2010 at 11:34 AMP.S. I added a video to the Space Fantasy listing page, so that those who haven't visited Japan can get a sense of the ride, from its opening day.
Published: October 1, 2010 at 1:32 PMI chose Transformers only because there wasn't a non of the above choice!
Published: October 1, 2010 at 1:51 PMKing Kong - for the sake of nostalgia...
Published: October 1, 2010 at 2:27 PMWOW, It was not number one when I saw this yesterday, but I guess there was a transformers upset. It would do well in Orlando, but I just see it as a fitting replacement for Spidey.... and like something that is already in Orlando. I agree with what Robert has to say about Madagascar. I also checked out an on-line video of Space Fantasy and it looked pretty cool.... although I do somewhat count Mummy as Universal's indoor coaster. Still, Space Fantasy and Mummy would be very different. Any of these additions would be one more thing to make going to Orlando fun and increase compitition. I also especially like any new ride that creates new atmosphere or things to see for both people on AND off of the ride (such as the way Manta came with things other than just being another roller coaster and created great scenery for those not on the ride).
Published: October 1, 2010 at 2:52 PMYou're right - I guess we should count The Mummy as an indoor roller coaster, but it just strikes me as such a different experience than something like Space Mountain that I forget about it being built around a coaster track when I think of the ride line-up at USF.