James Rao
Writer

Published: February 5, 2013 at 4:42 PM

Sadly, Maverick was not at Cedar Point the last time I visited. But, in this day and age of fully immersive themed environments, and ultra expensive, copycat attractions, there is still nothing better than the sublime thrill offered by a high quality, unique roller coaster. Maverick looks like a real sweet ride - and is definitely high up on my "to do" list. Now that my kids are all over 54" tall it is time to plan a trip to the Point....
Mike Gallagher

Published: February 5, 2013 at 6:31 PM

I didn't care for Maverick on my first rides in '07. I have come to like it after my more recent visits, especially in the back. Several points really catch me by surprise. It's also one of the few coasters in what people call "iron parks" with a single rider line that's usually open. It's nowhere near my fave coaster at the Point, but I wouldn't skip it if the line is manageable...and it does remain VERY popular.
James Koehl
Writer

Published: February 5, 2013 at 8:23 PM

Every time I ride Maverick, it reminds me why it is such a great coaster. It grabs you from the start and never lets up, never lets you go and relax. It is constant speed, turns, inversions- just an all-around great coaster. Thank you, Robert, for featuring it!
Ryan Spann

Published: February 5, 2013 at 9:08 PM

Maverick took the spot of my favorite coaster ever since I first rode it in 2007. I love the intensity and speed, and it doesn't need to be the tallest and fastest coaster in the world.
AJ Hummel

Published: February 5, 2013 at 9:54 PM

This is not only my favorite coaster at Cedar Point, but one of my top five steel coasters overall. The ride has a bit of everything andm other than a small amount of discomfort due to the restraints, it's very smooth and enjoyable. I just wish it had higher capacity as the line was at least an hour the one time I visited the park, so I only got to ride once.
Russell Meyer
Writer

Published: February 6, 2013 at 7:25 AM

Maverick is definitely a winner, but something Robert failed to note about this coaster is that it's initial design was flawed. There was an additional inversion on the second half of the ride that was found to be so intense during initial testing that it had to be removed.

It doesn't necessarily detract from the enjoyment, but demonstrates the inability of Intamin from a design standpoint to deliver a reliable, well engineered attraction. I do applaud Cedar Point for installing a well-themed coaster that runs pretty consistantly at a high capacity, but I wonder what this coaster could have been had it been properly designed from the get go.

134.117.251.38

Published: February 7, 2013 at 9:13 PM

Yes, after the train passes through the second launch and over the lake it goes between the rocks, that was the location for an inline roll that was found to put too much stress on the trains, and delayed the opening of the ride. I don't put the blame entirely on Intamin though, this coaster (my personal favourite) is the 500th designed by famed coaster engineer Werner Stengel, so even with all of his experience mistakes were made.

What I find most interesting about this coaster though is the use of linear motors rather than a chain or cable lift. It's incredibly smooth, and you feel the acceleration up the hill and over the top.

Alex Wilcox

Published: February 7, 2013 at 9:19 PM

Yes, after the train passes through the second launch and over the lake it goes between the rocks, that was the location for an inline roll that was found to put too much stress on the trains, and delayed the opening of the ride. I don't put the blame entirely on Intamin though, this coaster (my personal favourite) is the 500th designed by famed coaster engineer Werner Stengel, so even with all of his experience mistakes were made.

What I find most interesting about this coaster though is the use of linear motors rather than a chain or cable lift. It's incredibly smooth, and you feel the acceleration up the hill and over the top.

Charles Reichley

Published: February 7, 2013 at 11:46 PM

I don't get the love for this ride. I really do like it -- except for the restraint system. For those of us who are a bit shorter in the torso, it puts your ears right at some rather harsh pieces of shoulder gear, which hurts like heck when it bounces your head around.

Kings Dominion's Intimidator 305 shows that you can design a restraint system for those cars that is supremely comfortable. It is only expense that keeps Cedar Point from making this a truly enjoyable ride, rather than something to be endured.

I'll admit, I like the thrill enough that I've considered bringing earmuffs to the park, just to wear them on the Maverick.

BTW, the Fahrenheit ride at Hershey park has the same problem, as to a lesser degree some other rides.

Russell Meyer
Writer

Published: February 8, 2013 at 8:04 AM

The restraint system on Intimidator 305 is a retrofit---It started as the same that is present on Maverick and the other Intamin OTSRs. I'm not sure if they can convert Maverick to the "soft pad" system because of the inversions, but I do understand the hate for the restraints, especially from those shorter-torsoed guests.

"I don't put the blame entirely on Intamin though, this coaster (my personal favourite) is the 500th designed by famed coaster engineer Werner Stengel, so even with all of his experience mistakes were made."

The inversion removal is a black eye on Intamin, and is not a one-time deal. Intamin has had some serious design issues over the past few years. The cable fraying on their hydraulic launch coasters, the additional set of motors needed for Volcano, the complete debacle of Intimidator 305's opening season, and the issues this past season with SkyRush. Intamin hasn't opened a new coaster in the US without a significant problem in years. I'm sure I'll get a lot of flack for saying that, but it's the truth. Other coaster manufacturers don't have months of tweaking requiring major redesigns after installation. Everyone aside from Intamin typically gets it right the first time, and while every coaster goes through a "breaking in" process of minor adjustments, only Intamin has seen major retracking of their coasters within a year of installation.

When is the last time B&M had to take out an inversion? Even now-defunct Arrow only had one installation that required a major restrofit (Drachen Fire). So as good as Maverick may be (I happen to like it a lot), it should be noted that the ride we see today is not the same that was designed on paper, which is not how roller coaster design should go in the 21st Century,

Mike Gallagher

Published: February 8, 2013 at 8:04 AM

And let's not forget that Intamin's design flaws are not limited to roller coasters. Shoot The Rapids, anyone?
Russell Meyer
Writer

Published: February 8, 2013 at 8:07 AM

...and their drop towers (Acrophobia at SFOG and Superman Tower of Power at SFKK).
Mike Gallagher

Published: February 8, 2013 at 9:00 AM

Many of us know what happened at Kentucky Kingdom, but I don't recall ever reading about an incident on Acrophobia. Can you elaborate?
Russell Meyer
Writer

Published: February 8, 2013 at 1:45 PM

There were no specific incidents, but the attraction was eventually modified to eliminate the tilt, and was closed temporarily in response to the SFKK incident.