Published: October 18, 2013 at 1:35 AMThis sounds like going to a cinema and watch the exact movie, cut and pasted, with elements I like, in the hope I get a great movie. Or going to a restaurant and get exactly the food the system envisioned I wanted. It sounds great but it isn't. Why? Because it lacks the infusion of new things, of someone else's vision about what a movie can be or a great meal. It gives me more of the same and doesn't expand my horizon. It enforces a world that is tailored around me and not a new world for me to explore. New art, new ideas, new music everything will be categorised and injected and I won't grow into classical music or Jazz or Rock.
Published: October 18, 2013 at 2:12 AMI can't believe how you are just hitting it out of the park lately Robert. This is an incredible article. It's brilliant. You are totally making the connections that no one else is making. I love this article!
Published: October 18, 2013 at 3:54 AMIt would be amazing but... I don't, have never and will never stay on Disney property. Therefore I feel I am being totally alienated as a 1 or 2 day guest. I won't have one of these bands - I dont actually want to wear one all day anyway, can you keep it in your pocket? - so does my (no doubt by then) $120 entrance fee mean I don't get full value for all attractions. Does it become a band thing for a one day pass? I just don't know.
Published: October 18, 2013 at 4:59 AMWow can I link my magic band with a girl Navi and become one.
They should use this technology at gas stations too. It could be called speedpass.
Published: October 18, 2013 at 5:16 AMOT writes: "It sounds great but it isn't. Why? Because it lacks the infusion of new things, of someone else's vision about what a movie can be or a great meal."
I Respond: Why are these conditions mutually exclusive? Why can't the experience combine reactionary technology to suit the interests of individuals and (AT THE SAME TIME) provides "the infusion of new things, of someone else's vision about what a movie can be or a great meal?"
Published: October 18, 2013 at 7:03 AMI have mixed feelings if this technology comes into place. First of all, it basically forces people to get the Magic Bands and pay an up charge (I presume) beyond the ticket price. Second, I may be old school, but I don't really care that much about personal experiences. I just want Disney to make great attractions and keep things running smoothly. I know that isn't the wave of the future, but a lot of this just feels like smoke and mirrors.
Published: October 18, 2013 at 7:41 AMThis would certainly be a quantum leap in immersive and interactive nature of theme parks. I sure hope they can pull it off, and the fact that they don't appear to be rushing this development may ultimately pay off in an experience unlike anything else.
I would, however, be concerned at the reliability of the technology, and guests' reaction to it. Will people take offense to an integration of personal information. I know that while I notice that most websites tailor advertising based on what I look at on the internet, I know some people that get annoyed that advertisers know that they've looked at something and advertise those products/services to them on other websites. It's a fine line with this type of technology, and I think Disney is walking right up to it where some feathers may get ruffled over this. I also worry about the reliability of the technology and the volume of interactive elements within Pandora. The interactive queue elements within attractions like Haunted Mansion, Space Monutain, Indiana Jones and the Temple of the Forbidden Eye, and others work because you have a captive yet contantly progressing and changing audience. What happens if these elements are just out in the open as part of the landscape or themed elements along the land's paths? Will you have lines of people waiting for a chance to interact with the element?
I think about the Agent P Adventure in EPCOT or Sorcerers of the Magic Kingdom, and how those systems work. They are pretty neat activities, but they work because only a small subset of the guests are participating. In EPCOT they only have so many phones, while in MK, guests seem to be pretty orderly and form lines when it's necessary to interact with the elements. In some cases CMs are there to keep the lines moving in an orderly fashion. However, what happens when every guest can walk up to a plant and have it glow or move? You're going to either get lines of people for these little elements or you're going to get a bunch of kids hogging them and ultimately breaking them. If these things are widespread and relatively innocuous, it would probably work, but I'm curious to see how these type of interactive elements will be integrated into a theme park land, and how they will stand up to constant use. Will there need to be CMs scattered through Pandora just to make sure these things are working and are not abused and that guests take turns?
Published: October 18, 2013 at 9:47 AMTH writes: "Why can't the experience combine reactionary technology to suit the interests of individuals and (AT THE SAME TIME) provides "the infusion of new things, of someone else's vision about what a movie can be or a great meal?"
Anonymous dude replies: It has been my experience that in themed entertainment, the audience by and large has no idea what it wants. It is up to the show business to provide the audience with the escape that they desire.
If an audience does have specific ideas about what they want, it may fly directly in contrast to what was intended in a themed environment that otherwise is executed with 100% precision. Once you bring the audience in, you really have opened "Pandora's Box," so to speak.
Published: October 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM"Why are these conditions mutually exclusive?"
We are not quite there yet in technology. And even if we reach such milestones, it is too easy to exploit them and everyone will expect the results to be the same and easily get bored with them same old same old.
The IP gets people through the door because everyone is already familiar with the storyline and the characters and people generally want to experience the high in repetition. To personalize such experience, when it is already personalized in their mind, is offering something else.
Suppose you dream of a prince, a la Snow White. You want to experience Snow White while she pines for the prince (the movie experience). What if you turn it around and you become Snow White and you see the price and you tell him how you feel. That is the a new can of worms... and people didn't that was the narrative of Snow White's perspective in the original dark ride.
Take Pirates. It is too easy to make certain things happen in the landscape. If everyone sees it, it is your rendition of what you expect. There could be a multiple expectations when you're in the boat. How to personalize it so you see what you want to see and everyone else sees what they want.
At minimum, they might just do the equivalent of a wink. "Hello, welcome. We love you (your name). Come on back." Maybe do the hard thing. "Turtle Talk, The Ride" perhaps.