Published: March 11, 2014 at 11:25 AMNemesis lacks height but it remains possibly the best coaster I have ever ridden - it's subterranean setting ensures that it feels astonishingly fast, coupled with tight turns, extreme G-forces, and brilliant landscaping.
Published: March 11, 2014 at 5:06 PMTo me, Shambhala looks like the better coaster...longer, faster, some interesting elements, but the entire course is ruined because it runs next to a roadway which kills the aesthetics. While I would probably prefer to ride Shambhala, I will vote for Nemesis as it is appears to be the more immersive experience.
Why do parks build these coasters next to highways and parking lots? Ugh. Nothing takes you out of the magic faster than a badly placed attraction.
(The rumors ARE true, I AM a theme park snob!!!!!!)
Published: March 11, 2014 at 1:57 PMNemesis is a classic. Hard to believe it is 20 years old though!
Shambhala shows just what B&M can do when the park are willing to pay for it.
Having ridden both here (a rare thing in this competition!) I will go with Nemesis. It's not my favourite at Alton Towers - thats Oblivions spot - but it's certainly a unique and brilliant coaster. It's what all B&M's stateside wish they were. If you haven't ridden it - do it soon before she gets too old!
Published: March 11, 2014 at 4:01 PMFinally! I'm actually voting with the majority this time.
I know it's not the same as being there, but from the videos only, Nemesis seems amazingly well-themed because of the way it works so perfectly with the surrounding terrain, while Shambhala just felt like a big - okay, a REALLY, really big - coaster in someone's muddy, dug-up backyard. Do they ever plan to theme, or even just landscape, this ride a little?
Published: March 12, 2014 at 9:20 AMThis was a tough one since both coasters look outstanding and both rank in the top 15 on the Mitch Hawker Poll. I chose Shambhala because based on my riding experience I generally prefer hyper coasters to inverted coasters, but I would love to ride either one of these (and probably have a better shot at getting to Nemesis).
Published: March 12, 2014 at 11:20 AMBased just on the videos, not having ridden either one (may get to Alton Towers this year), I would first ride Shambhala because I'm a sucker for coasters with long drops and for me a ride such as Millennium Force or I-305 offers more thrills than a ride such as Montu or Alpengeist. As to placement of attractions near parking lots, James sure got that right. A prime example is a coaster in my home park. Kingda Ka offers a spectacular view, primarily of the parking lot, when you get to the top. And the only place to get a really good photograph of it is - you got it, the parking lot. Poor placement has negatively impacted so many rides. I-305 is nicely themed but essentially in the middle of a field, which is why I give MF with its spectacular view of Lake Erie a higher rating.
Published: March 12, 2014 at 11:53 AMHope this didn't go through twice, as I previously attempted to submit a comment. Based on the videos, I would read Shambhala first because I'm a sucker for coasters with long drops. Shambhala would be more like Millennium Force or I-305 than Nemesis - and I find that rides such as MF and I-305 offer more thrills than rides such as Montu or Alpengeist. As to the inadvisability of erecting coasters near parking lots, James got that right. A prime example is a coaster in my home park. Kingda Ka offers a spectacular view, primarily of the parking lot, when you get to the top - and the only place to get a good photograph of it is from the Skyride or, you guessed it, the parking lot.