Published: January 17, 2008 at 7:03 PMWELL....that leaves me out. I am 24 years old and i stand at 4'10". I wonder if they are literally going to be enforcing that height limit on short adults too. I understand the safety point of view, but if I go over there and they wont let me on because i'm too short I will raise HELL! I am not some squirly kid thats going to be sliding around.
Published: January 17, 2008 at 7:05 PMQuestions of the day... Is Greg Emmer still there? (Should one connect the dots between our two Disneyland posts this week?) Are the lawyers out of control? Or is attractions creating a PR nightmare to shake loose money for a needed rehab? Anyone want to set the over/under on how long this requirement lasts?
Published: January 18, 2008 at 7:11 AMIf the PC brigade have their way then very soon none of the seven dwarfs will be allowed to go on any of the rides unless Snow White rides with them............and that includes their own one.
Published: January 18, 2008 at 8:48 AMTHAT REALLY MAKES ME MAD. They should shut it down and rebuild. This means I literally cannot go to Disneyland anymore.! I have a son who is autistic and has been on that ride for a couple of years now. It is one of his favorites. If he sees other people going and the ride working and he is not allowed on it then he will throw a tantrum so bad that you would have to put him in a straight jacket! THis means I can't go to Disneyland because he will expect to go on that ride. I am so angry at this. He is 54 inches tall. He goes on Space Mtn and coasters that go upside down for god sakes. UGH!!!!!!
Published: January 18, 2008 at 9:06 AMI don't understand all the uproar, it's not a God given right to be able to ride every ride. They are doing this for SAFETY reasons, not to piss people off. I will never understand why people complain about not being tall enough or to fat to ride rides. There is a reason you can't ride, it's for your own personal safety and the safety of others. Think of the nightmare if someone was killed, you can't put someone's enjoyment above safety. I'm 6'2, if I went to a park and they said I can't ride because I'm to tall they guess what, I won't ride. I know there not telling me that to single me out, there has to be a good reason for those rules. The previous poster said it makes her Angry? Your angry because they are looking out for you and your child's Safety? Makes no sense to me.
Published: January 18, 2008 at 12:21 PMUgh. Disney, it's really simple. Instead of a 60 inch height requirement, do an age requirement. I remember hearing you have to be at least 7 years of age to ride alone on rides at Disneyland (that may not be true). So, why not you must be 7 years of age or older for the front? It's simple.
Published: January 19, 2008 at 3:18 PMSince this is supposed to fix an issue about immature kids squirming around in the front seat, I agree with some here that this would be better if it were an age requirement, rather than a height requirement. I'm a 21 year old vertically challenged person myself, at 5'2"-ish, so I barely make the height requirement. But if I were just 3 inches shorter, I'd wouldn't be allowed in the front? Seems like a bad rule.
Swap it out for an age requirement, not a height requirement.
Published: January 20, 2008 at 9:18 AMI can see the dissapointment, I have both a 6 and 8-yo. But as pointed out, the rule is for the front seat only. So in a way, I think really complaining like this sort of exhibits a degree of taking things for granted. People should feel lucky to 1) live in the U.S. as opposed to 99% of the other places in the world, 2) have something as cool as Disneyland in our country, 3) have enough money to afford to go to Disneyland in the first place, 4) being able to ride a cool ride like Splash Mountain at all. I know some people that would simply respond "get a life."