Just a simple opinionCedar Point: 25 million dollar roller coaster really isnt all that great. I think they should have added a little more to it.
From Ashley GibbonsIs it just me or does anyone else think that the Top Thrill Dragster isnt really top thrill. I understand that it is 420 ft tall and reaches the speed of 120 mph but honestly, you wait in line for 3 hours to ride a ride that is what, 6 seconds long? Does anybody else have any imput on this?
Posted August 13, 2007 at 4:18 PM
Comments in chronological order. Most recent at the bottom. Scroll down to respond.
From rafael gthat is the reason people wait 3 hours for. the 420 FT and the 120 MPH. i wouldn't wait that long for it, but some people will.
Posted August 13, 2007 at 4:44 PM
From Danny MelilloThey didn't add much to it because at the time it was built it was the tallest, and fastest coaster in the world, but not many people recognize that anymore because the next year Kingda Ka opened in SFGA.
Posted August 14, 2007 at 8:51 AM
From Jake CountissIt is short but I felt like my time waiting in line was worth it. It is amazing especially in the front row at night as your zooming past the lights. I don't think it is a waste.
Posted August 14, 2007 at 10:40 AM
From steve leeThere were two years between TTD and KK, Danny.
Posted August 14, 2007 at 2:07 PM
I think it's a dumb coaster, pure and simple, but it accomplished its primary goal - it got people talking about Cedar Point again. It had been a few years since Millenium Force and Cedar Point wasn't getting nearly as much attention as it warranted. With the opening of TTD, people couldn't shut up about the place. Everywhere you looked online you'd find pictures and videos of the new hotness.
I can't imagine all that attention didn't translate to increased revenue for the park. I wasn't really interested in the park until after the opening of TTD, and I can't imagine I'm the only person who falls into that category. And the thing is still packing them in. Last Friday the wait times for Maverick, Millie and TTD all topped 1:45 (and I have to point out that all three ran with no downtime while I was there).
So I don't like the coaster (or the park, really), but I can't deny that it was a brilliant investment on Cedar Fair's part.
From Logan Deckerwell personally I think you cant really say that it isnt top thrill cuase on what other roller coaster other than kingda ka (which was pretty much a copy of TTD) can you experience 120-122 mph and hights 115ft taller than the statue of liberty! This is why I think it is top thrill.
Posted August 14, 2007 at 2:46 PM
however I do NOT think it was worth 25 million
plus the matinence to keep it running properly
is probably outrages.
Just think they could have used that 25 million to build a bigger and better version of millennium force! that is what would put cedar point in the spotlight!
I just had to add that
From Dustin KernOkay guys, if you really want to see how much of an impact TTD had on Cedar Fair (the company, not talking about the individual park) go onto Cedar Fair's website and look at the revenue reports that they post online and compare the amount of money that they invest into the park (i.e. rides, operation expenses, food and game costs, general maintenace, and salaries) to profit and you'll see that it was a very smart move.
Posted August 14, 2007 at 4:11 PM
This discussion has been archived, and is not accepting additional responses.
Stories from a Theme Park Insider
What's it like to work in a theme park? Stories from a Theme Park Insider takes you inside the famous tunnels and backstage at Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom for a look at how theme parks really work, sharing the funny moments and embarrassments that can happen when your job is someone else's vacation.
Order now: Kindle | iBooks | Paperback | Kindle (UK)
Theme Park Insider Guidebooks
Top U.S. Theme Parks
Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom
Other Top International Parks
Readers' Top Themed Rides
Top Roller Coasters
Top Theme Park Shows
Features, News and Advice
2014 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr.
2013 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2012 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2010 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2009 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2008 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2007 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2006 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2005 Blog PostsDec.
2004-2005Staff column archive