Theme Park Insider

Get News by E-mail

Study Contends Thrill Ride G Forces Are Safe

A University of Pennsylvania study shows that G forces on thrill ride are *not* strong enough to cause injury.

From David Allen
Posted October 17, 2002 at 9:22 AM
A study by the University of Pennsylvania disputes the theory advanced by those who would regulate the g-forces on roller coasters.

Read it here: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/16/health/main525843.shtml


Comments in chronological order. Most recent at the bottom. Scroll down to respond.

From Robert Niles
Posted October 17, 2002 at 9:42 AM
The study looked at just three coasters: Disney-MGM's Rock 'n' Roller Coaster, Speed in Las Vegas and Face/Off at Kings Island.

Quote: "They found that the coasters produced accelerations to the head nine times less than what would be required to cause torn blood vessels in the brain and 18 times less than the force required to cause brain swelling."

Granted, three rides is probably not a large enough sample to close this issue for good. But this study does confirm to me that I was right with what I said earlier this year: It's not the G forces, but the restraints that are contributing to most of the head and neck injuries that we're seeing on high-speed and turbulent thrill rides.

Let's also remember that we are talking just about otherwise healthy people here. The aneurysm cases are another issue. But I contend that improper or ill-fitting restraints account for the vast majority of the head injuries, concussions or post-concussive symptoms that otherwise healthy people have incurred from riding these thrill rides.

The vast majority of people who ride, and follow the safety instructions, never experience any injury. But some folks do get hurt. And I would love to see one-tenth the public attention that has been focused on G forces be put on the issue of developing better restraint systems on thrill rides.

From Russell Meyer
Posted October 17, 2002 at 10:33 AM
Injuries also occur because of rider ignorance. Some people ride coasters that they are not prepared for. You should always look at a coaster, and make sure you in the right frame of mind, and know what to expect prior to riding. There's nothing worse than someone riding a looping coaster with your eye's closed. Part of preventing injury is preparing yourself for upcomming twists and turns. Also, people can injure themselves by boarding coasters with prior conditions, or impared by alcohol. It's up to people to be smart, and know that if a certain type of coaster has hurt you in the past, that you should think twice before riding a similar one again.

From Robert Niles
Posted October 17, 2002 at 11:34 AM
I mentioned "keep you eyes open" on my safety tips page, and I'm thankful when other people give that same advice.

Closing your eyes impairs your body's ability to "read and react" to what is coming on a roller coaster. Your body is constantly making adjustments that you don't consciously recognize. When you ride a thrill ride, you should be revelling in your senses, not shutting them off.

From Coaster Enthusiast
Posted October 17, 2002 at 1:01 PM
"...you should be revelling in your senses, not shutting them off."

Then along comes the 'totally-enclosed-in-the-dark-ride-coasters'

While I certainly agree that riders should keep their eyes open, there are a couple exceptions: the above mentioned Rock-N-RollerCoaster [along with Flight of Fear and Space Mountain] which are totally enclosed in darkness, and many inverted coasters where a rider's view is obstructed (very much so) by the train in front of him/her. A close friend of mine claims Alpengeist is the absolute most frightening coaster because he could not see what was coming up next. And, Volcano: The BLAST Coaster's second "blast" isn't even visible until you are *on* the ride itself.

Also, why did the article only rank piddly, little coasters and not the ones that pull 4 or more Gs? From what I hear, there are quite a LOT of folks complaining about Goliath's second helix which nears them to blacking out. Hypersonic-XLC is going through a major change due to the hard, upturn thrust into the 90º angle. And quite a bit more folks have been complaining about the whiplash effect caused by many rides' final breaking systems. For sure, a potential ride should be examined before entering the queue. However, there are other factors future victims ... er ... riders may need to know. ...

From Coaster Enthusiast
Posted October 17, 2002 at 1:32 PM

Okay, so Face-off is rated with a 5 G force. ... I rode the one @ SF America (not PKI) and it felt like it had less G force than many of the other rides there. Granted, I rode it after riding such other rides as Superman Ride of Steel and Brain Eraser ... er ... Mind Eraser.

From Jason Herrera
Posted October 17, 2002 at 7:21 PM
What wasn't mentioned in this article is the fact that yourself, or myself for that matter, could be affected differently by, rapid-head acceleration, rapid change in direction, etc...

This, like much of the research going into the perils of roller coaster riding is, insufficient...

From Coaster Enthusiast
Posted October 18, 2002 at 10:59 AM
Just in case anyone's interested ...

Six Flags is planning on eliminating its roller coasters: Friday, October 18, 2002 (Look for this date)

-ras : )
(shameless plug)

From Jeremy Ferrell
Posted October 21, 2002 at 7:30 PM
Interesting read. Although, I have a bit of trouble with the fact that they're basing their findings on only 3 coasters nationwide(and tame coasters besides). Not at all a representative sample, especially for an academic study.

From Anonymous
Posted April 8, 2003 at 8:22 PM
These are very small rides but I always come off Face-Off with a head because of the restraints. I think better restraints is the only thing that high G roller coasters need.

From Anonymous
Posted April 8, 2003 at 8:25 PM
I meant headache.

Has Theme Park Insider helped you have a better vacation?

Thank you for supporting the site!

Search Theme Park Insider

Reader Reviews, by Theme Park

United States Top 10 *

International parks

Readers' Top Themed Rides

Top Roller Coasters

Top Live Shows

Top Movies/Animated Shows

Theme Park Insider on Twitter

@ThemePark

Which would you prefer when staying on-site at a theme park: Early entry, front-of-lines access or free dining? Vote: http://bit.ly/b6Ng0s
2010-07-30 00:36 Link

RT @DisneyParks: BREAKING: We’re extending “Disney’s Main Street Electrical Parade” at Walt Disney World http://bit.ly/9TO6Mu
2010-07-29 13:42 Link

RT @FLallday: If you're looking to buy Disney tix, try doing so before Aug 1st (this Sunday) as tickets might increase that day!
2010-07-27 19:58 Link

RT @goddard_group: Here's an exclusive first look at SIX FLAGS DUBAILAND. Designed to be the first Six Flags branded park to be built... ...
2010-07-27 19:58 Link

Theme Park Reviews, Features, Advice

Theme Park News Archive

2010

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul.

2009

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2008

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2007

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2006

Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.

2005

Dec.

2004-2005

Staff column archive