The capacity level at Halloween Horror Nights is WAAAAY too much

Universal Orlando: HHN's capacity numbers don't allow guests to actually enjoy the event. Plus, what about a 21-and-over night at HHN?

From J. Dana
Posted October 24, 2007 at 6:06 PM
Okay, I just did my yearly Orlando Halloween Horror Nights last week. I picked Thursday, usually an off night, but I found out once I got there that school's were out on Friday, therefore, the park was PACKED.

We showed up at the 6:30pm start time, saw the Rocky Horror Picture Show stage show (mediocre to boring), waited over an hour for one haunted house, grabbed a slice of pizza, saw the last Bill & Ted of the evening (great show this year!), then that was it!!!! We had run out of time. At that point, all of the haunted houses were at 2 hours wait or longer.

Now, in full disclosure, we then hooked up with a friend who worked at Universal who got us immediately into three more haunted houses in a matter of minutes (30 minutes), because the park was closing.

I decided to visit guest relations to inquire about the evening, because had we not bumped into those friends, then we would have done only one house. For everyone else who had come that night WITHOUT an insider friend--THEY WERE SCREWED!!!

Not surprisingly, the line for complaints was very long. A series of guest relations employees told me the following: The park was not at capacity, so this was actually not the most crowded night. They went on to tell me that the previous Friday, one of the houses had a 4 HOUR wait. (seriously folks, what kind of dunder-head would wait that long???).

This is when I tried to decipher what exactly is meant by AT CAPACITY, because--as I informed the employees--when a person pays the $65 to come to the event on a NON-CAPACITY night, then that person should be able to do the haunted houses--which I've been able to do each year for the past four years. This year was different.

In true Universal form, all I got was, "I don't know," and "That's what we've been told." I then inquired if capacity meant that everybody in the park was standing shoulder-to-shoulder, would that be capacity?

HONESTLY, it was the worst hard-ticket event I'd ever experienced. And the 2-hour wait in the guest relations line proved that I wasn't alone in my assessment.

Does anyone out there know how capacity is determined? Because that Thursday night was far beyond what a "happy" experience could be.

I tried to get the Universal employees to understand that if a person cannot experience more than three attractions in the entire time the doors were open to the park, then the park is definitely over capacity REGARDLESS of what some bean-counting pinhead who never sets foot in the park says.

I got free open-ended passes for my entire party for anytime in the future, but a refund was out of the question. The kept inviting me to return the following Sunday--which sounds nice on the surface, but if I hated my experience as much as I did, then why would I accept MORE of that experience as a "make good"? It's like going to a restaurant and throwing up because of an allergic reaction to dairy, and then being offered more dairy from the restaurant as an apology.

Okay, I'm off my soapbox (for the time being), but this whole 'AT CAPACITY' BS really left me with an extreme bad taste in my mouth at the park.

To any pin-head bean counter out there who determines capacity, I just have this to say: GET INTO THE PARK and see if your "capacity numbers" actually line up with a guest being able to enjoy the park. All of us understand that when a park is busy, then you've got to make choices regarding what you want to do....but being able to do only three things (ONLY ONE HAUNTED HOUSE) the entire time I was in the park is so off-the-charts stupid that I will definitely reconsider my plans for next year.

I live in L.A. and travel to Orlando in October specifically for this event. Or I'll wait the two or three years for Disney's adult Halloween offering at the former MGM Studios (rumored to be coming in 2009 or 2010).

One more question: Would anyone out there support one or two age-limited nights??? In other words, would anyone support a night at Halloween Horror Nights where you had to show I.D. and be 21 in order to attend? I WOULD!!!!! And Universal could have a ball with all the drinks served, etc., not having to worry about underage drinkers. It's a little off topic, but definitely something I'd jump on--maybe. Don't get me wrong: theme parks are for kids (of all ages)...I'm just looking for ways that we could plan our HHN experience to the fullest.

From steve lee
Posted October 24, 2007 at 6:27 PM
I love the idea for an "over 21" night, though I can't imagine the park would ever do that. I'd honestly be happy enough if they could at least get rid of the numerous strollers encountered during the event (seriously, what the crap are people thinking?)

As for the issues of capacity, I completely agree that HHN has exploded in popularity and the park has failed to take the steps to limit overcrowding the place. Instead, they seem to have expanded the options for higher dollar RIP Tours and Express Passes for people who want to experience the entire thing in one night while at the same time lowering the amount of scare zones.

My second visit to HHN was definitely better than the first, but only moderately so. While we were able to pick up three more of the houses, the standby lines were insane. Oh, and when did people with Express Passes become such schmucks? On at least three occasions, people passing the standby line made derogatory comments regarding how stupid we were to not have the Express Passes (we had planned to, but by the time everyone in our group got their acts together it was too late).

Halloween Horror Nights is an excuse for Universal to print money - and they have earned that right - but the overall experience (in my opinion) has been slowly degrading with each passing year. Of course, we're already planning our group for next year. Will that be the one that makes us finally give up on the whole thing?

From Brady Allen
Posted October 24, 2007 at 7:09 PM
Need more nights!!! Why is it only on weekends?? there is 31 days in October!!

From Sherri Connelly
Posted October 25, 2007 at 4:32 AM
It is mostly only on weekends due to the fact that a lot of there employees are college kids and cannot work during the week.

I agree about the crowds. Hubby basically said we are not going next year unless we have a EP...it NEVER was needed before. We went on a Sunday night and it was just horrible. We saw people urinating behind a fence, and all security did was tell them to leave the line...WHY NOT THE PARK!!! Come on people.

Universal has lost site of what HHN is all about, and now all about $$$$

From Brandon Jackson
Posted October 25, 2007 at 2:13 PM
My friends and I drove down from Nashville Tn for our first HHN this year. I expected a crowd, but not like what I discovered. We bought tix for Sat 20th, Sun 21st, and Wed the 24th. The lines were INSANE. 2 hour waits for a house that lasts 5 minutes. Saturday night we didnt even attempt to wait in line. We just rode the normal rides. But were able to do half the houses on sun, and the rest on wed with bill and ted/jacks carnival show. I just wanted to agree that it was WAYYYY to crowded.

From Gareth H
Posted October 25, 2007 at 6:47 PM
Just got back from a 3 hour visit. Very busyt for a Thursday night.
75 min wait for houses at 8pm, extended hours until 2am.

Had to leave as just too busy, still, I got 2 houses in, a very wet trip on Jaws and a very quiet ride on EarthQuake.

Oh, and a good laugh at Rocky Horror....

From Erik Yates
Posted October 25, 2007 at 6:43 PM
Of course its all about the money. And you have to spend it to enjoy yourself. We had RIP tours two times we went, and did all the houses twice. Seriously, the Express system has everything out of wack. Its the reason why there are 4 hour waits. On top of all of that, they have launched a NATIONAL ad campaign to include the Three Biggest horror icons of recent times. And people are surprised by huge crowds? Yes it sucks. Yes its no fun to be in those lines, but its the nature of the beast. You have to be there early. Gate opening is not good enough anymore, you should have sprung for the 10 dollar ticket to get into the "Stay and Scream" area. We did about 3 houses before we saw any kind of wait. We did all of the houses before 8 p.m. except Dead silence.
All of these complaints are easily avoided. An over 21 night? No way in HELLo darlin. Why? Because they are in it to make money.
And you know let me go on a rant. No one can give me a good solid reason why "HHN sucked" this year other than the crowds, and they didnt get to see the houses. The houses they saw they loved, but they didnt get to see them, so they hated the entire event. It was a great event, it was well done and it had the best houses ever. No scre zones, but would that have made a difference? Yeah, it would have made crowds worse as they try to get a scare from a small area packed to the elbows. Should the event sell out? Yeah. Will it? Not a snowballs chance. They make too much money, and the parks are in it for that. Will disney ever do an adult event? Not likely. People complain in droves about Pleasure Island and alcohol. Imagine what they'll do if disney gets scary. The rumor has been around for 3 years, and it will stay just that, a rumor. If they ever take a chance and try it....it will be just as busy. Honestly, have you ever been to Not So Scary? Its a nightmare!
Go to fan sites, get a frequent fear pass, and do research. Get the most from HHN that you can.

From Brandon Jackson
Posted October 26, 2007 at 11:22 AM
I wanted to throw in that I LOVED the event. As crowded as it was..I loved it. A park employee told me that on saturday they had an attendance of 14k during the day..and 44k for HHN that night.

From Gareth H
Posted October 26, 2007 at 11:58 AM
They seem to have a lot more scaretators now. I guess as the park gets busier they can add more. Was a nice touch. Think they should do something with the street that T2 is on. Last year they did, this year its just smoke machines and nothing else!!

From shock absorber
Posted October 29, 2007 at 9:55 AM
First,you get “the hookup” from an employee friend who gives you some fast access to three additional houses for a total of 4 (so you got to do half the houses in the park)…THEN you have the nerve to complain at Guest Relations because it was crowded and you felt cheated? Are you kidding? Based on your own logic, your argument with Guest Relations was without merit. You claimed that if you could not do more than three attractions the park was at capacity, although you never explained the basis for that magic number. You DID experience more than three attractions: You saw two shows and did four haunted houses…and let’s not forget your pizza…so why are you complaining? Based on your own experience, they were not at capacity, so you don’t need a “pin-head bean counter” to explain anything.

And what about all those people who did not get the special treatment you got from your friend? Which, by the way, shame on him or her for doing that. You got to do three houses in about 30 minutes…we paid almost $70 a piece for an Express Pass and had to wait longer than that, so don’t boo-hoo about the crowds. You at least got something for nothing. Then they gave you (and all your whiney, spoiled friends) an open-ended ticket. Sounds like they tried to be accommodating and you made out like a bandit yet you still are ungrateful. Here’s a tip: buy an Express Pass next time.

Next, having a ticket in hand does not guarantee you anything once you get in the park. In stead of seeing shows you could have waited in lines like the thousands of other people. Finally, do some research the next time you plan your trip. Most repeat visitors are well aware of Hell Night, in which every school kid in Orange County will descend upon the park that Thursday because they are out of school Friday.

To get slightly off point here, I can give a solid reason as to why HHN “sucked” this year. After 13 years of going, this was the worst HHN ever. Not because of crowds…that’s to be expected. But because we did do all the houses in one night and they were boring, uninspired, and not scary. Five houses based on horror films while the other three were just rehashed houses that had been done before. Where was the originality? Universal sacrificed quality for quantity. Halfway through the night my 14 year -old cousin said “I thought this was going to be scary”. That pretty much summed it up. But about a week after the event Universal sent me an online survey about HHN (a very thorough, detailed survey, I might add) and I am glad they at least give people an opportunity to leave feedback.

It’s ok to hate the event because the quality is lousy, but don’t get pissy about crowds and long lines, especially when you get exclusive FREE special treatment.

From Sylvia Acosta
Posted October 29, 2007 at 10:34 AM
When I went on the 19th, it was really packed. I know that on the Friday the 13th House, the Orlando Fire Marshall was using a golf clicker to allow only a certain amount of people in, at a time, which slowed down the line even more. The park was defenitely filled to capacity. Defenitely get the express pass, we got to see everything! All the rides, shows and houses.

From J. Dana
Posted October 29, 2007 at 11:11 AM
Yo, Shock Absorber, it appears as if you haven't absorbed all those shocks to the head very well. What you're saying is that my opinion regarding capacity is not valid because I just-so-happened to run into a friend at 30 minutes before close who was able to escort us backstage and into lines? You're missing the point completely. HAD I NOT met that friend, the night would have been a waste. And for the 40K who sweltered in long lines to experience maybe 3 of the park's 8 haunted houses, it SUCKED. And for all you boneheads who keep saying "just spend more and buy the Express Pass," my answer is NO. Paying sixty bucks (full admission) means I get a ticket to an event. That ticket is a legal contract between me and Universal saying that they have taken adequate means to provide an adequately enjoyable experience. Since you're a little dense, Mr. Absorber, let me put it in terms you might be able to fathom:

If I buy a ticket to a movie, I have a resonable amount of expectation that I will be able to see that movie in its entirety, yes? However, if management decides to sell twice as many tickets as theater seats, thus causing people to sit on top of each other and stand in front of people and fighting for seats, it ruins the movie. They haven't gone over capacity, because they can still stick warm bodies in the room, irregardless if it prohibits 90% of the moviegoers from seeing most of the movie. It doesn't fix the problem to then offer MORE EXPENSIVE tickets which enable a person to sit in the front row--a row which could have been used by the general ticket holder, but is now reserved for only ticket holders who pay higher prices. The theater has made twice as much money, and a small percentage has enjoyed their film, but the vast majority are pissed off--and NO, I refuse to pay for the same movie twice just to see the second half.

Does that make sense? What you're saying to me is, "Well, since someone gave you a ticket to go to the front row for the last few minutes of the movie, then you have no reason to complain???"

If you'll reread my post, I DID MENTION that I thought that most people on the night in question had been screwed out of a good experience. It wasn't just about me and my "spoiled friends." I was referring to the night in general. The two-hour complaint line was testament to that fact. And I DID tell guest service about my quick three-house expedition in the last 30 minutes....I was there to voice my complaint about the six hours in the park that nearly sucked because of OBVIOUS OVER CAPAICITY.

You can chime on all you want about Express Passes, Hell Night, etc etc. I've done HHN for five years now, and it's always crowded. This year, however, it was obscenely out of whack to the point of uselessness.

I'm not whining. I'm stating facts. Yep, I lucked up in my last 30 minutes. But that doesn't improve the crap-fest that was the rest of the night...and you mention that doing the shows was a choice that I made--yep, you're right. I've done them for five years now--I've even done Bill&Ted twice once...but with reasonable capacities, the HHN experience is good (although never perfect). Good enough to make me come back. This year's greed-fest was enough to make me puke--and stay home.

Go ahead Shock, call me spoiled and whiny--it doesn't change the facts. And nothing you say can obscure them. And by the way, you mentioned that most of the haunted houses were worse than years previous--what I'm saying is that most HHN attendees can't make the comparison, because they couldn't get into more than two houses.

From Chris Wilkes
Posted October 30, 2007 at 5:35 AM
J. Dana

I'm still not sure how your times add up. If you were there from 6:30 to closing- that is about 7 hours.
You say you waited (1 hour) for one Haunted House.
Saw Bill & Ted (1 hr).
Saw Rocky Horror and had a slice of pizza (1 hr).
That's 3 hours... Where did the other 4 hours you were there go?

I also don't think it is fair to admonish the park for the entire event, when from what everyone is saying, you went on what is notoriously one of the worst nights for crowds of the whole month.
I was there this past Friday night... and yes, it was very crowded- however that didn't hinder my enjoyment. I saw 3 houses... the Billy & Ted show, rode the Mummy twice, MIB once and spent the rest of the time wandering around and soaking up atmosphere. All without fastpass... and without even staying past 11:30.
It looks to me, like you just picked a crappy night to go- and seem to have several hours of time that's not accounted for.
Sorry you had a bad time... but your experience is not the same as everyone else's.

Oh, and "irregardless" is not a word. Sorry, that's a pet peeve of mine.

From J. Dana
Posted October 30, 2007 at 2:19 PM
Hmmm, I had to look up the grammar on that one:

From dictionary.com:
ir·re·gard·less
–adverb Nonstandard. regardless.
[Origin: 1910–15; ir-2 (prob. after irrespective) + regardless]

—Usage note Irregardless is considered nonstandard because of the two negative elements ir- and -less. It was probably formed on the analogy of such words as irrespective, irrelevant, and irreparable. Those who use it, including on occasion educated speakers, may do so from a desire to add emphasis. Irregardless first appeared in the early 20th century and was perhaps popularized by its use in a comic radio program of the 1930s.

Who says that theme park insider isn't educational? I say it is IRREGARDLESS of the detractors: (note, I'm using the word usage relating to the 4th entry for the word from dictionary.com, which reads the following:
irregardless
adverb
regardless; a combination of irrespective and regardless sometimes used humorously.)
(Also, I have two pet peeves of my own--the first being the extended use of parenthetical expressions [phrases inside parenthesis] and the subsequent use of brackets [sample] used within parenthetical expressions.). *It's never clear how to punctuate the end of a sentence that ends with a parenthetical, especially if the parenthetical is a question and the sentence is not (Does that make sense?).

Second pet peeve: Using the word "IMPACT" as a verb. It's a noun and hasn't meandered lazily into a verb yet--except in the minds of lazy executives everywhere who think it sounds strong, but is actually just a lazy general word that doesn't mean a whole lot.

P.S. My THIRD pet peeve: Writing words in ALL CAPS.

And to explain the "missing hours" from my HHN experience: I spent that time agonizing over signs throughout the park that thought it necessary to capitalize the first letter of every word on the sign except for conjuctions and less-than-four-letter prepositions. They think they're clever, but it's just plain WRONG (there I go again with that DARN [self-knowing example] all-cap clap-trap!).

From Tyler W.
Posted October 30, 2007 at 2:18 PM
YOU SHOULD'T BE COMPLAINING BECAUSE NOT EVERYONE KNOWS PEOPLE THAT WORK THERE AND CAN CUT LINES.

From J. Dana
Posted October 30, 2007 at 2:20 PM
I'm complaining for the masses...don't hate me because I'm nearly lucky. It's for you, my theme park insider compatriots EVERYWHERE (yuck, just broke my third pet peeve from the above post [and my first].) that I complain...I am raising my voice for a better, equitable, and a compassionate conserva...er, consumer. Can't we all just get along?

P.S. But before all the tomatos come flying my way, just let me say this: The night had a few fun moments, but the overwhelming majority was just plain RUINED by overcrowding. My lost hours? Um, the few things I did do had long waits as well...I even had to wait nearly 20 minutes to use the bathroom--and nearly 30 minutes to wait for the girls in our group to do so. I've been there during crowds many times and for many events--and YES, it is the park's fault for overcrowding, not the school district's. The park can limit the warm bodies through the gates. They refuse because the rest of the year they're bleeding away customers and going down the drain. Harry Potter can't come soon enough. Universal Studios Orlando (the park separate from IOA) is one of the most boring, meaningless parks in the "top-tier" realm of theme parks. I used to love it, but it only sees the soles of my feet during HHN now (and that may soon change).

From Gareth H
Posted November 3, 2007 at 11:04 AM
As big a pain as it was having to queue for hours, I did enjoy this years event.

The shows were great, Bill & Ted got better toward the end, as it does every year. The Rocky Horror Show Tribute was fun and memorable. The Freak show was just that, Freaky.

One night I went there were lots of scaretators by the Entrance but apart from that they were few and far between.

The houses were all really good, the more I did them the more I apprechiated what goes into putting them together, and looking around gave me the chance to get scared, quiet a lot toward the end.

It was a shame that in the final days they closed some of the rides. Shrek 4D and Jimmy Neutron no longer opened and Jaws seemed to close too much, BUT..

Overall, it was fun. I'll miss it until next year when hopefully it will be better.

Roll on Mardi Gras!

From Erik Yates
Posted November 4, 2007 at 2:06 PM
I heard final night for HHN, 5 minute waits for everything. Goes to show you.....its just the nights people decided to go.

From JAMES GALLIFORD
Posted November 8, 2007 at 11:35 AM
I have to say I sort of agree with the poster. I go every year for a week to universal orlando and choose october so I can go to HHN. What I usually find is its obviously better to go on the wed or thurs nights when they have them (obviously). and I too got stuck on the thursday before a school holiday last year so I know what the poster meant about the overcrowding but I think it was just a bad night to go. That thursday we did the shows at the beginning went into 2 houses right away caught bill and ted and left before 11 ...it was like an ocean of high school kids coming in by then and we were ready to go. I do think the capacity is much too high for the event but if you go on an unpopular weekday and get there right from the start...i usually "stay and scream" pass it. you can do everything no problem. this year was a lot more crowded than past years and I definitely think its stupid to try and do it without the fast pass thing now. And that being the case the poster is right to complain because you should be able to do a good ammount of whats offered without the extra fast pass and the way it was this year, even on the weekdays you couldnt enjoy it past 9 oclock without one. I do go 3 times on my vacation to HHN soi can spread it out but I agree that there should be better crowd control and a lower capacity. I definitely think it should be all the oct nights people are there on vacation all week its odd to have to say you can only do it on the weekends. I dontthink a 21 plus event would make it any better I think they could make it earlier so the younger kids with their families could enjoy the houses in the afternoons and leave earlier.

This discussion has been archived, and is not accepting additional responses.

Park tickets

Weekly newsletter

New attraction reviews

News archive