![]() |
![]() | ||||
| Theme Park Guides |
Theme Park Hotels |
Staff Columns |
Theme Park Discussion |
Accident Watch |
|
|
|
By Robert Niles Posted via 209.178.148.185 on May 2, 2005 at 11:01 PM (MST)
Dear Michael Eisner, Readers' reviews: Comments:From Arthur Cashin
AMEN. Why on earth are they not running Schoolhouse Rock on the Disney Channel anyway! It is a completely underutilized asset. How about going on a ride at Conjunction Junction or visiting Lolly's to get your adverbs. You could see Mr Twelve Toes or the 4 legged zoo. Posted via 68.239.161.136 on May 3, 2005 at 8:34 AM (MST) They just don't give a hoot anymore. $100 Million for Everest but not a dime for education!
From Jason Moore
As a fellow member of the generation who so dearly shares your love of Schoolhouse Rock, i would absolutely love to see something like this. Unfortunately, i have to call into question it's multigenerational appeal. A few years back there was some sort of stage version performed locally. Several of my collegues were able to take their students on a feild trip to see it (if I remember correctly these children would have been middle school age). The teachers, who represented a generation older than you and I, just didn't get the appeal. the students, who represent a generation or two younger, didn't care for it either. there were those few exceptions that happened to be into a retro love phase at the time, but I fear that Schoolhouse Rock, like many other elements of the 70s/80s pop culture are limited in their appeal to those of us who grew up loving them. Mind you, I could be slightly off on this. If they can pull off successfully relaunching the Muppets in a way that appeals to multiple generations, then I might be willing to see them give this a shot also. Posted via 24.227.42.142 on May 3, 2005 at 8:38 AM (MST)
From J. Dana
Robert, there are very few times when I read something and a light just clicks on...Reading your open letter to Eisner was one of those times. When I read it, I just said to myself, "Egads! I think he's got it." I was actually excited to read it. Robert, in my humble opinion, this is one of the ABSOLUTE BEST ideas I've heard for a Disney attraction in A VERY, VERY long time. Although the thought never crossed my mind, I'm sitting here thinking, "It's an obvious choice!" There's got to be some reason it's not been done before, but whatever that reason is, I'm signing my signature to your petition here....Mr. Eisner, Let's Rock! Posted via 208.173.46.42 on May 3, 2005 at 5:06 PM (MST)
From Robert OGrosky
Yes i agree that DCA needs a e-ticket attraction!!! But imho the one mentioned by Robert N isnt it and is a example of one letting nostaglia get in the way of a good idea.Posted via 207.89.155.80 on May 3, 2005 at 7:41 PM (MST) And i also agree that Roy doesnt get the credit he deserves. And you do need the moneymen to make a company successful. But without the creativity and dreaming of a person like Walt there woul have been no Walt Disney company and no valuable vaults of movies/characters/vast amounts of land for eisner to have used. He did do a great job for awhile with the help of many like Wells/katzenberg etc, but that was over a decade ago and sadly he stayed in charge way past his prime abd things like DCA and other half day parks are a big part his legacy.
From Jason Lester
After reading Disney War I can't agree with you stating that Eisner tops Walt Disney. Without Walt there would be no Disney company and Eisner's apparently threatning techniques and rash decisions don't reflect positively on him. He has also made some huge mistakes (cough*DCA*cough), but I can agree with you that when he first started he was good. Very good. He did, however, decline greatly. Posted via 66.214.87.109 on May 6, 2005 at 6:48 PM (MST) I also agree that DCA needs an E Ticket land to save it, but I have grown up in the mid 90s and now so I was never exposed to SR. With regards,
From David Eggert
I grew up in the mid 80's and loved seeing SR on ABC on saturday mornings. I think that there is potential for a SR land to be a great sucess, but Disney would have to relaunch the SR brand first. Older generations know and love SR, but if you introduce it to a teen, they won't be interested. Disney needs to start airing episodes on ABC on Saturday mornings, Disney Chanel, Toon Disney, and (in Canada) Family Chanel. Hit the kids with it while they're young and then, a few years down the road, move forward on a SR land. If it were to open tomorrow, it would be a meager sucess at best, and an outright failure at worst. I would love to see this land created, but it would have to be introduced properly. Posted via 24.70.95.204 on May 13, 2005 at 5:37 PM (MST)
From Kevin Baxter
Great idea! Especially when I had it a few years ago!!!! Remember my Fixing DCA thread (that I can't find) where I proposed a bunch of Epcot-like pavilions to fill out the current parking lot? (There was one like the Land pavilion, but focusing on the deserts, the mountains, and the current agri part already in DCA... there was a Winter Olympics one with a coaster... a Western one... etc.) Anyhow, I proposed they tear up the wretched Wharf area and put in a Capitol building which would hold SEVERAL Schoolhouse Rock dark rides. I stand by ANY Schoolhouse rock ride, but give me more than one in a distinctive building like this and I'd be even happier! Posted via 69.111.105.9 on May 27, 2005 at 5:15 AM (MST)
From Valerie Orris
Ditch the hundreds of parking spaces and OPEN THE LAND!!!!!!! Posted via 68.108.144.18 on June 24, 2005 at 10:17 PM (MST)
|
These pages are in no way affiliated with nor endorsed by Busch Entertainment, Cedar Fair, Legoland, NBC Universal, Paramount Parks, Tussaud's Group, Six Flags, the Walt Disney Company or any other theme park company. Images and any text trademarks are included here solely for the purpose of eliciting fair use comment and criticism from the public.