G Forces Aren't the Only IssueLawmakers and consumer advocates working to limit G forces on thrill rides will miss a larger opportunity to help even more theme park visitors if they do nothing else to address the issue of head support and restraint.
From Robert NilesThe Los Angeles Times has a front-page story on G forces and thrill rides this morning. There's nothing new that hasn't been reported here before, including the New Jersey G force regulations. But it does bring wider attention to the issue.
Posted May 27, 2002 at 1:28 PM
What bothers me, though, is that no one seems to recognize that there are two issues at play here regarding brain injuries: G forces, and head whipping.
* * *
No one should die from riding a theme park ride.
Lawyers, lawmakers and consumer advocates are bringing the public's attention to the high G forces on some of the nation's roller coasters. High G forces can be deadly to people with pre-existing medical conditions, such as aneurysms, and can even impair the abilities of otherwise healthy people.
But high G forces are not the only element endangering theme park visitors. Poorly designed head restraints, or the lack of head restraints altogether, on high-speed rides may be causing more injuries than high G forces.
When a head is improperly restrained on a high-speed ride, it can whip in several directions, placing stress on blood vessels within the head and neck. If that stress is too great, those blood vessels can break, injuring or killing the rider.
The most widely noted recent death from a head whipping injury was that of NASCAR driver Dale Earnhardt. Earnhardt died of massive blood loss after his unrestrained head whipped forward violently during a crash, according to an independent medical examiner hired by the Tribune Company, who examined Earnhardt's autopsy photos. The incident, coupled with the deaths of several other drivers under similar circumstances in NASCAR and the CART racing series, prompted the nation's major auto racing series to require drivers to wear head and neck restraints such as the HANS device during competition.
Similar forces, on a lesser scale, may have contributed to the injuries of riders on attractions like Disneyland's Indiana Jones Adventure, who have suffered hemorrhages, concussions and severe headaches. Indiana Jones is not a roller coaster, and does not subject its riders to high G forces. But it, and other rides based on flight simulator technology, do pitch and twist riders unpredictably, whipping their heads in many directions during the ride.
Even on roller coasters, where one can often see what's coming by looking at the track ahead, riders suffer brain injuries when their heads bang repeatedly against ill-fitting over-the-shoulder restraints, or whip freely around turns with no restraint at all. How many of you have exited an attraction feeling beaten and bruised from a bad over-the-shoulder restraint? Or with a headache or nausea after having your head whipped around on a ride?
But head whipping can cause damage to blood vessels inside the brains of perfectly healthy people, leading to headaches, concussions and even death. Indeed, many of the thrill ride brain injuries on a list recently released by U.S. Rep. Ed Markey (D. Mass.) involve incidents where head whipping, in addition to G forces, may have contributed to the injury.
Physicians don't yet know at what specific point the average person will suffer permanent neurological damage after multiple exposures to high G forces. And individuals with aneurysms have no business on a roller coaster, or other thrill ride.
Unfortunately, a sign on a thrill ride warning people with aneurysms to stay away won't help those who don't know they suffer from that condition. Americans need better preventive medical screening for aneurysms and other long-term health defects. How many young athletes die each year because their congenital heart defects weren't detected in a routine medical exam? People should know if their bodies suffer from a silent symptom that might one day kill them.
We've done a good job as a society of screening people for high blood pressure, cholesterol and some forms of cancer. Let's defer the billion-dollar tax cuts for a few years and spend the necessary money on research to find ways to protect us from other silent killers, as well.
If G force restrictions reduce the speed and turbulence of some roller coasters, that should help reduce the head whipping problem. But G force restrictions alone won't solve it. As we've seen on rides such as Indiana Jones Adventure, healthy riders are at risk for brain injuries even on low G force rides.
No one's asking parks to force riders to don race-car-style HANS devices. But it's reasonable to think that the people who helped design better restraints for race-car drivers could devise better systems for thrill rides, as well.
The theme park industry needs to design better head restraints on high-speed and turbulent rides. Ideally, it would do so voluntarily, but if the industry delays, lawsuits or legislation will be needed.
But lawmakers, consumer advocates and the industry will miss a larger opportunity to help even more theme park visitors if they focus exclusively on G forces and do nothing else to address the issue of head support and restraint.
Comments in chronological order. Most recent at the bottom. Scroll down to respond.
From Max ScheiberThey should fix the restraints and/or make all roller coasters like the Dania Beach Hurricane. That is the smoothest ride I have ever been on. Neither me or anyone I know has gotten whiplash or even a very minor injury on it.
Posted October 10, 2002 at 2:55 PM
From AnonymousThey need them on all rides, no matter how small and tame. I was on the Mine Train at SFOT. I was six at the time and was just all enough to ride. I had no idea the big drop was coming and had settled my head my head in a bad position when suddenly, Wham! the car flew downward, and my head smacked the side of the car. I stumbled out of the car and had to go right home after that. On the Tamest Coaster in that park! (that wasnt made for kids)
Posted April 8, 2003 at 7:25 PM
From AnonymousBeing a tall individual with a long neck, I encounter major discomfort on many rides with over the shoulder head restraints. This is because my head is way above the restraint leaving it it whip from side to side while only my neck remains in place. It's a very frightening experiance because it feels as if my neck is going to break. I'm unable to ride most coasters because of this. New coasters, such as The Hulk in orlando, do an excellent job of supporting my head and the smooth tracks only sweetens the deal. Unfortunately, it's almost impossible to know if a ride will support me until I'm already on it.
Posted April 9, 2003 at 10:58 AM
From AnonymousI received whiplash after riding a roller coaster last year. I thought I was still healing a year later, but came to find out that I now have nerve and eye damage from the whiplash. I was a normal healthy person beforehand, in my late 20's. I have struggled to finish my college degree with adaptions such as my textbooks on audiotape, the damage to my eyes limits my reading ability. Now, going into a desperate work force, I am limited due to my disabilites. If only I had known, I would have never ridden the roller coaster!
Posted September 18, 2003 at 4:09 AM
This discussion has been archived, and is not accepting additional responses.
Theme Park Insider: Orlando 2014
Get all of Theme Park Insider's reader ratings, tips, and advice for planning a trip to Walt Disney World, Universal Orlando, or SeaWorld, in our new 2014 Orlando guidebook! It's more than 200 pages of well-tested, insider information that will help you get the most from your vacation.
Order now: Kindle | iBooks | Paperback | Kindle (UK)
Theme Park Insider Guidebooks
Top U.S. Theme Parks
Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom
Other Top International Parks
Readers' Top Themed Rides
Top Roller Coasters
Top Theme Park Shows
Features, News and Advice
2014 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar.
2013 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2012 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2010 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2009 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2008 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2007 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2006 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2005 Blog PostsDec.
2004-2005Staff column archive