A New 'Mini-Mega Park' in Orlando?A new park may be coming to International Drive.
From Nick MarkhamThe Baker Leisure Group is disscussing a new park to be placed on 70 acres of land south of Orlando Festival Bay Mall currently titled "the Orlando Thrill Park". the plans so far are for 15 rides to be in the park, including:
Posted October 14, 2010 at 11:57 AM
-An Intamin ZacSpin coaster
-Two 312 foot tall S&S towers
-A 5th Dimension S&S Coaster (Think X2)
and to top it all off...
-A 425 foot tall Intamin launch coaster (similar to Top Thrill Dragster)
Here are the confirming news storys:
Comments in chronological order. Most recent at the bottom. Scroll down to respond.
From David GrahamScreamscape has art work for what layout is "suppose" to look like. Rumors are some rides from the closed Hard Rock might come to it, since it's Baker Leisure Group as well.
Posted October 14, 2010 at 12:30 PM
According the Fox News today, the developers were suppose to be meeting with residents around there to talk about impacts for them. They also stated that most businesses around there support it for more $$$ and foot traffic for them as well.
From Nick MarkhamBetween this, SFMM, and Busch Gardens, we've had quite the busy news day!
Posted October 14, 2010 at 12:35 PM
From Pyra-Danny VOH this sounds so exciting! (As if there wasn't enough stuff to do in Orlando already) I can't wait to drive by and watch the construction progression
Posted October 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM
From Robert NilesThe Baker tie-in prompts me to wonder if this might be intended as a destination for some of the rides from the now-defunct Hard Rock/Freestyle Music Park in South Carolina.
Posted October 14, 2010 at 4:41 PM
No inside info. Just throwin' it out there.
From Mike GallagherIf Zeppelin and Life In The Fast Lane find a new home, I'll be happy. They are/were terrific examples of their type.
Posted October 14, 2010 at 5:24 PM
From Nick Markham^Robert, that is what everyone is thinking and would make perfect snese, as I think while the three big coasters are great that are planned, adding the Hard Rock coasters is an inexpensive way to double your coaster count for the park which in turn draws more visitors.
Posted October 15, 2010 at 7:58 AM
From Gareth HHa ha, Bordering on residential area Tangelo Park.
Posted October 16, 2010 at 11:04 AM
Well lets invest some money in security then, not the greatest of areas.
Bordering Festival Bay mall on the other side?
Personally, this sounds like lots of talk without much chance of action.
You've already got "Fun Spot" 2 minutes away, a kiddie park with no real draw for Adults.
Universal is only a 5 min drive away.
And remember, that this new park would border on a residential area, so try and get planning permission through for these proposed big thrill rides (Look at the problems Alton Towers in the UK have had)
This reminds me of the "Great Orlando Wheel" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Orlando_Wheel) that was suspended due to financing.
From steve leeIf they actually manage to pull this off (and I'm not optimistic), here's hoping they're smart enough to realize that they're going to have to seriously undercut the prices of their competitors. I'm not going to pay $50 for a couple of credits when there's 8 to 9 other parks around. Hopefully there's still people at Baker who learned lessons from Hard Rock/Freestyle (although I think the Baker people did a good job with what they had last year).
Posted October 16, 2010 at 12:52 PM
From Derek PotterThree words that make me wonder...
Posted October 16, 2010 at 8:30 PM
Baker Leisure Group
I think a thrill park would be a nice addition to Orlando. There's a whole lot of theme...not a lot of thrill in Orlando. If done right it could be a winner. If they can't make a park happen in the zero competition, high tourist market of Myrtle Beach, then what makes me think they could pull of a park in Orlando.
Don't get me wrong, I wish them all the luck in the world..I just have my doubts based on whose park it would be.
From Nick Markham^I think they should do better in the Orlando market than the Myrtle Beach market, because while Myrtle Beach recieves a lot of visitors, none of them generally come for theme parks and neither do the people living there. Orlando on the other hand is almost completely about the theme parks!
Posted October 17, 2010 at 6:59 AM
From Derek PotterOrlando also has Disney, Universal, and Sea World...with Busch Gardens and Legoland in the vicinity. If they can't make a park fly with zero competition and endless amounts of potential visitors, why am I to think they would meet expectations in Orlando?
Posted October 17, 2010 at 11:32 AM
Of course there's a lot more to the Hard Rock story then them simply not being successful. They were hobbled by a ridiculous lawsuit filed and somehow won by previous owners, and the park had zero standing with suppliers, vendors, and other contractors because of non-payment the year before. They bought the park for a song though, so I just don't get it. Also, Myrtle Beach isn't just a 3 month beach town anymore. There are scores of other attractions in the area that thrive. Water parks, mini golf, shows, giant shopping malls, small amusement parks...etc etc, enjoy a lot of success. Obviously people aren't on the beach all of the time. There's no reason why that property couldn't have been successful
The edge they have is the presence of big time scream machines in a sea of themed attractions. I think a thrill park would work in the area just fine, but it's a tough market, and management is key. If it were Cedar Fair, Herschend, or the Holiday World management handling it, I wouldn't be as skeptical.
From Nick MarkhamIt will succeed because it would be different. Every park in Orlando is very nicely themed, but none can be considered a thrill park. If they put a 426-foot tall Intamin coaster and an S&S 5-D Coaster, people will come. Hard Rock just didn't have any attraction close to that, along with Cypress Gardens.
Posted October 17, 2010 at 12:43 PM
And as far as the Myrtle Beach area, please tell me an amusement park which has succeeded tremendously. Nobody goes to Myrtyle Beach for an amusement park.
From Mike GallagherNick said: "Nobody goes to Myrtyle Beach for an amusement park."
Posted October 17, 2010 at 1:52 PM
I guess that makes me a nobody, then. Granted, it was part of a trip that included Dollywood, BG Tampa, Wild Adventures, SF Georgia, and Kings Dominion. But the fact remains, the ONLY reason I went to Myrtle beach was to visit HRP.
From Nick Markham^Yes, I would go to Myrtle Beach for Freestyle Music Park anytime if included with a bunch of other parks, but now that park is gone with no chance of coming back, so my statement for the present time being can stand.
Posted October 17, 2010 at 4:33 PM
I am not trying to be rude about the whole Myrtyle Beach thing, I just don't think you all should name this park a failure before it even gets a chance based off of a park the failed before. One must fail before they succeed.
From Derek PotterThat's part of my case, owners never gave Hard Rock/Freestyle a chance to succeed. They expected and banked on such big numbers and then went bust when they didn't get them. If they would have been a little more patient with their money, charged a little less, marketed better, and stuck out the recession, they would have been successful. Myrtle Beach had a record year for tourists this year, as opposed to 2008 when the economy was at it's absolute worst in 70 years.
Posted October 18, 2010 at 5:02 AM
One of my big questions with them is this. Are these guys going to cut and run again?
From Jesse KeyI am hearing a lot about lawsuits and such with Hard rock park here in SC.... you know, basically people who are owed money are probably trying to figure out how to suck blood out of that turnip to get what they can back out of it. So what I wonder, or is my question, is will they let a company that had a hand in Hard Rock park get those rides without a hefty pricetag due to trying to get that money that it owes from bankruptcy and such? This is an actual question because I don't know the awnsers to the question or the scenarios surrounding it.... lol.
Posted October 18, 2010 at 9:59 AM
As far as the new park your talking of in Orlando, I personally don't think it would be high on my list of places to visit while in the area based on it being another park like Six Flags or whatever. If I wanted to go to Six Flags or a Cedar Point park, there are ones much closer than Orlando. I go to orlando for quality rides and attractions, not the thrill park attractions like you'd expect at Cedar Point or Kings Dominion. I guess it does give people another option though.
Why not consider building in Jacksonville? It's close to Orlando.... people driving to Orlando can stop there on the way (since this park sounds like a one day park). It also is a big city with locals who might be willing to get season passes since it would be an hour closer to them than the Orlando parks. Maybe, maybe not.... but could be looked into.
From Pyra-Danny VI changed my mind... although I will definitely enjoy watching the progress of the park from groundbreaking to opening day... I have my serious doubts about how awesome this park will be.
Posted October 18, 2010 at 12:29 PM
I'm expecting another ho-hum Fun Spot-ish type of place. Just rides, no real theme or memories. Just a place to eat your money.
From Derek PotterI'm not sure of the status of those coasters at Hard Rock. Maybe they could have 6 months ago, but I don't know if they could simply remove coasters from the property now. I think the only way would be to either sell them (to their own company?) or to win them in a future auction that's likely to happen. I don't think the company itself has declared bankruptcy, but I do know that the holders of the mortgage in SC are ready to pull the trigger on foreclosure. Just depends on the language in all the paperwork.
Posted October 18, 2010 at 1:31 PM
From Nick MarkhamPyra, you don't need to theme the park when you have coasters like they have proposed. while theming is a plus, some people don't understand the ride experience on the proposed coasters is aqmazing, especially a 5D Coaster by S&S (trust me, X2 is my #1 and I have ridden 72 coasters).
Posted October 18, 2010 at 8:09 PM
So, if they follow through with the proposed rides, it will be difficult for the park to be unsuccessful.
From Derek Potter...unless it's mismanaged
Posted October 19, 2010 at 1:51 PM
From Nick Markham^They would have to be EXTREMLY bad mangers, but it has happened in the past...
Posted October 19, 2010 at 3:48 PM
From David SutterAnything with Baker gets me wondering. If their in it how far off is Land South? It appears everything they have touched in the last few years has failed.
Posted October 20, 2010 at 3:01 AM
From Joel ShelbyIn the end, does anyone think this this park will end up being built when all the dust clears?
Posted October 27, 2010 at 12:16 AM
Thanks for all the insights :)
From Joel ShelbyIt would be nice for the park to be built. I find it sad that the low income residents of tangelo park dont want it. The city will push it through to create jobs, hopefully the thugs of tangelo park wont come into the park and make it nasty. The economy is bad, people needs jobs. Orlando also needs more thrill rides, its tiem the lwo income residents of tangelo park shut up.
Posted October 27, 2010 at 12:37 AM
This discussion has been archived, and is not accepting additional responses.
Theme Park Insider Guidebooks
Top U.S. Theme Parks
Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom
Other Top International Parks
Readers' Top Themed Rides
Top Roller Coasters
Top Theme Park Shows
Features, News and Advice
2013 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2012 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2010 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2009 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2008 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2007 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2006 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2005 Blog PostsDec.
2004-2005Staff column archive