|
|
Between the Mummy and Everest which one is wilder?By wilder I mean feeling stronger physical sensations.
From Daniel Etcheberry
I have ridden the Mummy, and I enjoyed it. But I don't want anything stronger than the Mummy.Posted June 20, 2011 at 7:46 AM
Comments in chronological order. Most recent at the bottom. Scroll down to respond. From Derek Morse
hmmmmm....I'd say Everest is a bit wilder than Mummy, but that is just my opinion. I love them both.Posted June 20, 2011 at 7:51 AM
From aj geez
The next thing that is close to the mummy in Florida would be Kraken at seaward and Incredible Hulk ... This is not opinionated ... IT FACTS !!! Posted June 20, 2011 at 9:30 AM
From Tony Duda
Everest is a good roller coaster with a nice theme. Mummy is a lot jerkier in it's movements with more intense visuals. I would say Mummy is "wilder" considering the flames and such.Posted June 20, 2011 at 10:59 AM
From Nick Markham
Mummy launches, but I when I first rode through that double helix inside Everest, I'd have sworn I had gone through a couple inversions. Posted June 20, 2011 at 11:54 AM Mummy is also intense first off the launch I feel, but I'm gonna give it to Everest.
From Nick Dakuginow
In my opinion, their equally "wild". Posted June 20, 2011 at 12:02 PM You've ridden Revenge of the Mummy already and have experienced the launch upwards, the slight drops, and nice speed of the roller coaster. On Expedition Everest... 1. It's a longer coaster.
From Mike Gallagher
AJ said: "The next thing that is close to the mummy in Florida would be Kraken at seaward and Incredible Hulk ... This is not opinionated ... IT FACTS !!!"Posted June 20, 2011 at 12:16 PM If you say so. But what do your "facts" have to do with Daniel's question regarding Mummy vs. Everest? And what's "seaward?" A hospital section in the ocean?
From Chris Hall
Given your definition of what you mean by "wilder" (i.e. "By wilder I mean feeling stronger physical sensations.") I'd have to say the "wilder" of the two is Expedition Everest. The g-forces through the backwards portion and the helix is a lot stonger than any part of The Mummy IMO. But, that being said, you would really miss out on a great roller coaster by skipping Everest! No upside down at all, and it only lasts a few minutes. Posted June 20, 2011 at 12:42 PM
From Daniel Etcheberry
I suppose Rock N' Roller Coaster is even more intense than Everest and The Mummy because of the loops. Am I right?Posted June 20, 2011 at 6:01 PM
From Dan Grace
The Mummy hands down. I think they speed it up during HHNPosted June 20, 2011 at 7:04 PM
From Chris Hall
Daniel: It may sound strange, but I think Rock N' Roller Coaster is smoother and less intense than Everest. Well, maybe they are about the same. Yes, Rock N' Roller Coaster does loops and twists but they are so smooth that the sensation is not as intense to me. I'm probably in the minority but I can ride Rock N' Roller Coaster back to back as many times as I want ... but if I ride Everest twice back to back I feel dizzy. If given the choice between Everest and Rock N' Roller Coaster I'd choose Rock N' Roller Coaster any day!Posted June 21, 2011 at 5:51 AM
From Adam Nodjomian
In order of intensity from least to great:Posted June 21, 2011 at 6:09 AM 1. Mummy: Goes backwards for a few feet, has a semi-fast launch (that I didn't even notice on my first ride), and goes through a section of darkness. Only one steep drop. 2. Expedition Everest: Goes backwards in the dark for awhile with big drops. Much higher so if you're afraid of heights it's worse. There is a big drop with a big helix at the end. 3. Rock 'n' Rollercoaster: Very fast launch, a few loops and corkscrews, and loud music (by the way, this ride is only fun with the music). No big drops.
From Daniel Etcheberry
Thanks everyone for the info.Posted June 21, 2011 at 7:42 AM
From Mike Sperduto
The difference between The Mummy and Everest is the Mummys animatronic actually works lol.Posted June 21, 2011 at 11:07 AM
From Mike Sperduto
Seriously though I think both coaster are decent coasters, not the fastest or most intense but just good rides that the whole family can ride and that's what Disney and Universal set on doing with these two rides. Posted June 21, 2011 at 11:12 AM
From Michael Owen
I think they are both very different. Mummy has a fairly intense launch, but Everest is a lot bigger, meaning if heights is an issue then Everest would be seen as more intense. Posted June 21, 2011 at 11:18 AM The thing about Disney is, even on their larger thrill rides such as Everest, they try to allow as broad an audience as possible on it, so it's not nearly as intense as, for example Kraken, Incredible Hulk and Rip, Ride and RockIt.
From Donna McKay
Did they change Mummy? I rode it not long after it opened and it seemed much wilder then than it does now. I thought the backward section was longer back then. Am I mistaken?Posted June 22, 2011 at 12:05 PM
From Dan S
I am going to say that the WILDER of the two is Everest, because of the steeper drops, the longer backwards with the g-force. But i think that the real question is, which one is better? Because having a wilder ride doesn't make one better, and these two rides are great to compare because they are both similar. Posted June 22, 2011 at 12:41 PM
From Valerie F
Everest, for sure. Both are extremely fun rides but Everest has this part where you go backwards REALLY fast... it's intense!Posted June 24, 2011 at 5:32 PM
From chris lincoln
The mummy hands down! It was incredible! I found everest disapointing.Posted June 24, 2011 at 5:54 PM
From Laura Willis
I have to say The Mummy. It's dark and fast and just crazy insane fun! I love me some EE but Mummy is the better thrill ride. Posted July 1, 2011 at 11:31 AM
This discussion has been archived, and is not accepting additional responses.
|
Plan your theme park vacation with our readers' travel guides: Top U.S. Theme ParksWalt Disney World's Magic Kingdom Other Top International ParksTokyo Disneyland Readers' Top Themed Rides
Journey to the Center of the Earth Top Roller Coasters
El Toro Top Theme Park Shows
Fantasmic! Features, News and Advice"Stories from a Theme Park Insider" 2013 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May
2012 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2010 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2009 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2008 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2007 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2006 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2005 Blog PostsDec.
2004-2005Staff column archive
|
©1999-2013 Robert Niles.
"Theme Park Insider" ® is a registered trademark of Robert Niles.
About Theme Park Insider - Rules for Writing and Rating - Privacy Policy - Contact the Editor