Apparently, the Disco Yeti is now the Emo Yeti. The Day the Yeti Died.Walt Disney World: The Disco Yeti is now completely dark.
From Rod WhitenackAccording to posts at ScreamPark, Animal Kingdom's Disco Yeti has now gone completely dark. Even the strobe lights have stopped working. Either that or the Yeti finally got sick of Disco. Personally, I'm hoping for a Punk Rock Yeti. Here's the scoop:
Posted June 22, 2011 at 1:54 PM
General Park News - (6/22/11) The latest reports on the Disco Yeti at Animal Kingdom are not good… from what I’m told the Yeti is no longer covered up… nor does it appear to be lit up by strobes. According to two different reports, the final room is almost entirely dark… you can barely see the Yeti just standing there in the dark… doing nothing, which is kind of sad. So I guess instead of Disco Yeti... we now have Emo Yeti. At this point, I think I’d be happy to see a Stilt-Walker in a Yeti Costume dancing the to the Macarena than to have nothing at all.
Comments in chronological order. Most recent at the bottom. Scroll down to respond.
From James RaoAll we can hope is that this move is a precursor to a long term fix.
Posted June 23, 2011 at 3:59 AM
From Nick MarkhamAccording to Screamscape today, Disco Yeti is back, but the full fledged one is not yet.
Posted June 23, 2011 at 6:18 AM
From Rod WhitenackAs much as I would sympathize with anyone visiting Animal Kingdom and finding Expedition Everest closed, I really think Disney should fix the Yeti or this just becomes a better than usually themed roller coaster without the central hook. It seems to me that Disney could afford to build another animatronic Yeti, program it in the warehouse and only close the ride for a couple of weeks to take out the other structure, install and test the new one.
Posted June 23, 2011 at 6:12 PM
From James RaoThe problem is not the Yeti himself. The concrete foundation on which he is mounted has become irrevocably cracked. A few more lunges and he will topple onto an oncoming train for real! Lawsuit city!
Posted June 23, 2011 at 8:43 PM
Disney is going to have to remove the whole structure that supports the Yeti, disconnect him, and do work on the support structure, and then re-install everything. To accomplish this fix, the coaster would be down for up to six months. That's why it has been such a major problem.
Personally, I think it is better in the long run for Everest to be closed for several months and emerge shiny and new, than to minimize the main narrative element of a story-driven ride as they have done for the last four years.
Shame on Disney for building a park with so few attractions that a single ride closure could become such a huge customer service nightmare. Just think how much easier a few months of Everest downtime would be if the once-planned Beastly Kingdom had been built as intended...
From Victoria JurkowskiPerhaps first they should fix up dinoland, maybe replace primeval whirl with something better themed with more capacity. then it would be feasible to have everest down long enough to fix it.
Posted June 24, 2011 at 5:34 AM
From Carrie HoodWhat really gets me is that the Yeti had to have been in testing for months. They had to know the general load stress of the figure before it even left testing, so this leaves me one question.
Posted June 24, 2011 at 12:48 PM
Who was cutting corners and made the call "One single Animatronic can't possibly need that much load bearing stress resistance! Use this number, not that one!".
From James RaoThat "call" probably came from the same fella who canceled Beastly Kingdom and approved Dinoland USA: Michael Eisner.
Posted June 25, 2011 at 11:39 AM
And, I agree with Victoria, if Dinoland was nuked and replaced with something more fitting of a Disney park (think Paradise Pier makeover), then Everest downtime would not be a huge issue.
That being said, my next visit to WDW (presuming the world doesn't end first) will be in fall 2013. Disney has at least two more years to correct the Yeti, otherwise DAK may not be on my list of parks to visit. I can easily add another day at Epcot instead.
From Jorge ArnoldsonMan, I really hate to see millions of dollars go to waste into what was once an outstanding animatronic. At least when the T-Rex at the end of the Jurassic Park ride broke down, the ride closed a few days later. You see, Universal actually cares about what their guests think about their parks.
Posted June 25, 2011 at 6:12 PM
From Phil B.The failure of the Yeti falls squarely on the shoulders of the engineers at WDI. The failure that is Chester and Hester's Dino-Crap-O-Rama and the fact that a Beastly Kingdom wasn't initially built when the park opened, that would allow to help absorb the impact of EE's downtime to fix the Yeti falls squarely on the shoulders of Eisner and all the bean counters who continuously stifle creativity with the awesome power of financial mathematics.
Posted June 25, 2011 at 9:00 PM
The question I've lately found myself asking about this whole Yeti debacle, is why was there such a need to build the beast with such massive power, energy and force exertion. You always here how the Yeti is able to exert as much energy as a 747 jet. Lots of good that does you when the ride is open for only 5 years and the star of the show has been down for most of that time. Really though, it's the base of the animatronic that was under engineered as opposed to the Yeti being so powerful. What a waste of money and R&D to just have something that advanced sit around in the dark getting hit with strobe lights and fans.
From Carrie HoodI'm much in the same boat as James.
Posted June 26, 2011 at 3:24 AM
My last two trips down to WDW haven't included Animal Kingdom. I was never that impressed with it to begin with then once Dinosaur got changed I never bothered going back. Having moved out of Orlando, by the time we got back down the Yeti was already busted and into B-mode since it never got fixed or came back up, we never bothered going. I don't need the coaster count that badly and since I have little hope for it being fixed by fall of 2012, I doubt we'll head to AK again that year.
From Derek PotterI'm waiting to hear the news that one of you "very passionate" people preoccupied with this ride went berserk at Disney and set fire to the terminally ill yeti...therefore putting it out of its misery.
Posted June 26, 2011 at 2:09 PM
It's odd that a park so financially well endowed and so highly regarded for upkeep and quality would let the centerpiece of a 100 million dollar ride dance like an idiot when it should be scaring people.
From chris lincolnThis ride really isnt that good
Posted June 26, 2011 at 3:48 PM
From Tim WWe skipped Animal Kingdom this year. The only thing we missed was Kilamanjaro and Finding Nemo the Musical. Oh well...there is always next year...
Posted June 26, 2011 at 5:53 PM
From James RaoThat's what has me shaking my head as well, Derek. Obviously, the answer is greed. Check out how the attendance on DAK has climbed for the last few years. Disney doesn't want to rock the boat.
Posted June 27, 2011 at 5:25 AM
But the tide is turning. I just bought some matches and a plane ticket....
From Rod WhitenackI keep hearing about the concrete foundation built to hold the Yeti and the months it would take to tear it down and replace it, as well as additional months to program the beast itself.
Posted June 27, 2011 at 7:37 AM
I'm sorry, but I just can't believe that the amazing Disney Imagineers can't come up with a creative solution to this problem. These guys are the best minds in the business. Maybe they don't need to rebuild it the same way it was built before; maybe they can improve the design and simplify it to work better and longer than before. The audience only sees it for a second. Maybe it doesn't need the range of motion it has. There has got to be a better fix for this than a disco ball.
From Daniel EtcheberryI got the solution:
Posted June 27, 2011 at 1:40 PM
Take away the animatronic and replace it with a cast member in a Yeti suit. Arrrrh!
From Terry O'NealNo Eisner, no Animal Kingdom at all.
Posted June 27, 2011 at 3:38 PM
From Scott BSix months to fix Yeti? They just built a super-walmart in less time than that a couple of towns over from me.
Posted June 28, 2011 at 9:51 AM
Seriously, these Wal-Marts pop out of nowhere. Maybe Wal-Mart should fix the ride? Yes? No?
From Daniel EtcheberryTwo Yetis for the price of one :)
Posted June 28, 2011 at 12:51 PM
From David AckermanIn keeping with the trend toward "plusing up" attractions... replace the Yeti with Mickie and Minnie. They could build a set of stairs and have it as a character meet and great as well. Bingo! Two attractions for the price of one. The bean counters will love it.
Posted June 29, 2011 at 7:51 AM
From Matthew BlackerPerhaps too much time went into the trip to Tibet. They placed a lot of effort on maintaining cultural accuracy in the queue but it seems not enough effort went into structural engineering.Or, maybe it was simply the mass of Joe Rohde's humongous earring that caused the Yeti to break.
Posted June 29, 2011 at 10:28 AM
From James RaoYeah, that earring is a bit out of control. Maybe trying to overcompensate for something else...?
Posted June 29, 2011 at 8:11 PM
From Andrew HoldenFor me, Animal Kingdom is probably one of the most underrated parks, It just does not get enough credit.
Posted July 1, 2011 at 7:58 AM
First to address the yeti problem:
For those of you who think that Everest is just not a good ride, you are entitled to your opinion, but me as well as most otherrs who ride (along with a fair amount of theme park enthusiasts) are going to have to disagree).
As for you Animal Kingdom bashers, sure, we did not get the best possible experience out of Animal Kingdom, but it is still an AMAZING theme park, and hands down better than a Universal park any day. Again, you just have to get out of that ALL COASTERS ALL THE TIME mode, because you will be disappointed. If people would just slow down and enjoy the baobab trees, than they would realize that Animal Kingdom can be a great place. It has two of the best live shows in Disney history, a good (albeit small) collection of rides, a safari that can't be beat unless you travel to Africa, two awesome animal trails as well as so much more. Does Dinoland USA leave something to be desired, sure! However I will take it over hometown crappypark any day. We have been spoiled by Disney, and while its not a bad thing, we just have to realize every once in a while that we are lucky for it!
Now I will get off my soapbox before I get rotten vegetables thrown at me.
From James RaoI love Disney's Animal Kingdom, but it is a flawed masterpiece. Four things keep it from getting the love you say it so richly deserves:
Posted July 1, 2011 at 12:35 PM
1) The Yeti Choke - a problem that is a slap in the face to Disney fans each day it does not get fixed. There is nothing logical about letting the main narrative element on a story driven ride fall into such a state of disrepair. Whether they are "in the know" or not, people should get off that coaster saying, "Wow! That was awesome! Did you see the Yeti - he was amazing!" Instead it's more like, "Meh. That was pretty good. Did you see the Yeti - at all?" The ONLY reason Disney has not fixed the problem is because they know the down time of Everest will impact attendance - or in other words, their bottom line. If greed is logical, then they are making a logical choice.
One more thing: at least the Abominable Snowman in the Matterhorn (a half century old attraction) fulfills the full measure of its creation. The Yeti at Everest is nothing more than a broken prop or a museum statue, silent, unmoving, and barely visible.
2) Rafiki's Planet Watch - a subpar petting zoo not worth the time investment of a round trip on the train.
3) Dinoland USA - a small piece of Six Flags at a Disney park. Utter crap.
4) Too few attractions (half day park syndrome). Now, I am all for exploring the park in a leisurely, zoo like fashion, as I wrote in my 2010 WDW Trip Report ("I love Animal Kingdom and think it is a near perfect mix of theme park and Zoo. Therefore, I am one of the few people who think it is a two-day park because there is a wealth of exploring to do and many hidden treasures.") However, my sentiments do not resonate with how the "average visitor" seems to feel. After the three o'clock parade guests bolt out of that park as if a real (moving) yeti was in pursuit. It is a good thing the park closes at 5 or 6 PM, cause it would be embarrassingly empty if it stayed open any longer.
Don't let your love of Disney (a love that I share) blind you to the truth: DAK needs a DCA makeover, and soon.
From Rod WhitenackJames,
Posted July 2, 2011 at 7:22 PM
I totally agree with what you said about the Matterhorn. There you get to see the Yeti TWICE and it works just fine for such an ancient attraction. Maybe if Disney just did a quick fix on the Yeti so its eyes lit up and its mouth moved when it roared, this wouldn't seem like such a fiasco. The Yeti is the star of the show! I know it's very expensive running the Disney Parks, but they also make billions in constantly flowing revenue. It's embarrassing for an E ticket attraction like this one to be be so shamefully left in this state. Since when did "good enough" become a Disney ideal?
From Carrie HoodRod,
Posted July 3, 2011 at 5:12 AM
One word: Eisner.
From Andy StevensJames.
Posted July 4, 2011 at 2:34 AM
I have to agree with you regarding 'Rafikis Planet Watch'. The usual Disney attention to detail was missing when they failed to use a proper steam train. As soon as you get on the train and realise it's run by motor, any interest is gone and after that all is lost.
Dinoland is completely out of context.
That said, AK has its good (and excellent) points and with a bit of thought and not too much expense (relatively speaking) could be a world beater.
This discussion has been archived, and is not accepting additional responses.
Theme Park Insider Guidebooks
Top U.S. Theme Parks
Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom
Other Top International Parks
Readers' Top Themed Rides
Top Roller Coasters
Top Theme Park Shows
Features, News and Advice
2014 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar.
2013 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2012 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2010 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2009 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2008 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2007 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2006 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2005 Blog PostsDec.
2004-2005Staff column archive