What should Six Flags do about Peanuts?
The license that the former Cedar Fair signed for the characters expires this year, though there is an option in that deal to extend it to 2030. Given the resurgence in popularity of the IP and the company's recent investment in new Peanuts-themed attractions at several parks, I cannot imagine that Six Flags would not exercise that option, should the merger not have invalidated it.
Here is out story about the license deal, from when it was last extended in 2017: Snoopy stay home - Cedar Fair extends its 'Peanuts' license deal
Peanuts is not the only kid-focused IP that Six Flags licenses. The legacy Six Flags parks license Looney Tunes, thanks to those parks at one point being owned by the same company as Warner Bros.
Last year, Theme Park Insider readers voted that the new Six Flags ought to license Looney Tunes over Peanuts, should it have to choose one or the other. Yet the current license for Looney Tunes characters extends for many more years, so it does not appear in any danger of going away, at least at the legacy Six Flags parks.
The new Six Flags does not seem nearly as obsessed with homogenized park experiences as the old Six Flags management was. So perhaps the solution here will be to keep extending Peanuts at the legacy Cedar Fair parks rather than paying to extend the Looney Tunes license to them.
But with Six Flags facing an obvious cash crunch, is that the best deal for the company? Peanuts Worldwide likely stands in a much better negotiating position now than it was in 2017, thanks to Apple TV's investment in the brand. And Looney Tunes is reeling, thanks to Warner Bros.' mismanagement of (if not contempt for) the franchise.
Could Six Flags save itself some cash by dropping Peanuts in favor of Looney Tunes? Or is exercising the option the best deal for the company at the moment, given the expense of stripping the Peanuts IP from its current lands and attractions? That way, Six Flags can kick the can down the road for another five years, when everyone's business may have changed.
If I were to guess - and I am - I suspect that Six Flags already has chosen to exercise the option and keep Peanuts for another five years. And that, afterward, Peanuts might be going away from the parks unless Six Flags' financial position improves dramatically, or Peanuts Worldwide is willing to extend with favorable terms because there is no other good option for them.
But what if - and yes, I am stirring the pot here - Universal decides that it wants the Peanuts rights in the US as well as in Asia? Or if the expanding Herschend decides to get into IP with what would be perhaps the most compatible franchise for that company? Or if United Parks breaks up with Sesame Workshop and needs a new partner?
Any competition for the Peanuts license might push Six Flags out of the bidding. Again, it all depends upon Six Flags’ financial standing in five years, which we cannot know at this point, given the swift changes happening across the industry.
That said, not having Peanuts might turn out to be a blessing of opportunity for Six Flags. To me, Looney Tunes has one of the highest ceilings in entertainment. Not in kids’ entertainment - all of entertainment. “What’s Opera, Doc?” And “One Froggy Evening” are two of the best short films ever made - just perfect examples of what movie entertainment can be.
Unfortunately, Warner Bros. has not invested in refreshing its Looney Tunes franchise the way that Disney has with its core IP, or even Peanuts Worldwide has in recent years. Current Warner Bros. management even has floated the idea of selling off the IP, it cares so little about it. That’s not just a shame for existing fans, it’s a foolish, myopic business decision given the power of these characters to resonate with audiences across multiple generations.
But if Warner Bros.’ indifference means that Six Flags can extend its theme park rights to the characters to all parks for cheap, that’s an opportunity for Six Flags. Now, Six Flags would need to hire or outsource a creative shop to chart an engaging direction for these characters in its parks - one that remans faithful to the characters’ core attributes while extending their relevance to new audiences.
I can name at least a dozen creators working in this field who might offer to commit unspeakable things for the opportunity to do just that. So finding that talent would not be an issue, provided that Six Flags managers were willing to use some of the its savings in not extending a Peanuts deal to hire these creators.
With Six Flags now searching for a new CEO, who knows what that management will see as a priority in just a few years? But I would love to see the company quit resigning itself to being a low-cost, thrills-only second choice for people who think that they can’t afford Disney or Universal.
There is opportunity for Six Flags to get back into storytelling - and to use its kids’ franchise to do that. It’s just up to Six Flags to see that opportunity and then to go after it.
* * *
For more theme park news and analysis, please sign up for Theme Park Insider's weekly newsletter.
Give the Looney Tunes to Universal. Or I know this will never happen, Disney. The biggest mistake of their was choosing Fox over the WB.
Actually, the Looney Tunes license came from the Marriott days at Great America, and when Six Flags acquired the park in 1984, they also acquired the license.
Is the Looney Tunes contract under the same deal as the DC characters? If so it may make sense for Six Flags to offer to release the characters to WBD for a price. The company doesn’t have the resources to fully exploit the DC characters and WBD may be able to move them over to Kabletown as a Super Hero Island replacement contingent on the Mouse buying out the Marvel contract. Cedar Fair released the seemingly lucrative Nickelodeon and Paramount licensing agreements after the company’s last major deal, and I could see history repeating itself.
Also regarding the Mouse, FOX was a much, much, better fit for the company than WBD, which has too much overlap.
There are some inaccuracies about your points. First off, there's no real source that WB's considering selling off the Looney Tunes. The only source is a guy who's known for providing false information for clicks, also, I feel like the Apple TV deal has devalued the Peanuts. The specials no longer air on national TV. Finally, Warner Bros. is splitting next year, that could change things.
Cedar Fair has been consistently investing in the Peanuts characters, with upgrades to the kids areas being a regular project for the chain and marketing featuring the characters being fairly prominent. While it's possible their current financial situation may force them to consider dropping the license, I don't think there's any other reason they would willingly part ways with it. Additionally, the characters are prominently featured at every single one of the legacy Cedar Fair parks, meaning retheming everything would be a rather expensive undertaking.
On the other hand, while Six Flags invested heavily in their DC properties, the same has not been the case for Looney Tunes. I can't recall seeing them utilized heavily by Six Flags since the mid-2010s, and unless I'm mistaken there hasn't been a project related to them at any park in the chain since SFMM redid their kids area in 2014. Additionally, the characters are only actually featured at about half the legacy Six Flags parks these days, so it would probably be much easier to surrender the Looney Tunes license and genericize the remaining attractions featuring them.
To me, the logical thing to do would be to keep the Peanuts license for now, expand them in an inexpensive manner to parks that don't currently have Looney Tunes as a bit of a trial, and then use that to decide which way to go moving forward. However, very little of what new Six Flags has done has been logical, and with the financial state of the company I could easily seem them canceling the license, ripping out anything explicitly Peanuts over the offseason, and calling it a day. I don't think Looney Tunes is being expanded, at least not in the near future.
There is no question Peanuts is more popular with kids than Looney Tunes. My daughter loves seeing the Peanuts characters at the legacy Cedar Fair parks and knows them from the Peanuts specials, books, and recent movies. On the other hand she only has ever seen the Looney Tunes characters at Six Flags, and I suspect its probably the same for most kids (and kids that have never been to a Six Flags probably have never heard of them at all). SF announced last year that SFGAm is getting a new kids area in 2026 and I think it would be a no brainer to add a Peanuts area to the park.
When I was a kid/teenager (a long time ago) everyone knew Looney Tunes and it was definitely more popular than Peanuts...strange how things change.
What if universal buys looney tunes. Not the rights, the whole damn brand?
On a personal note, my daughter and niece love Cedar Point because of the Peanuts gang. It is, "The Snoopy Place." Legacy CF have done a better job with Peanuts than Legacy SF has done with either Looney Tunes or DC. I think SF still has the latter two locked down forever (for a small annual fee) as a result of their spinoff from Warner back in the day. I love all three brands, but I recognize that Looney Tunes in particular hasn't been all that relevant since "Space Jam," so I don't know who else would want it. Universal already has the problem of outdated cartoons in Toon Lagoon, though Bugs Bunny would be a much better character than anything currently in that land, to be fair. It is a shame that Universal can't try to build anything based on DC. Marvel Superhero Island was originally going to be DC-themed (I think the current SF-Warner deal blocked that) and I think that would be a good way to let those characters move to WDW that fans and the public would somewhat accept.
This article has been archived and is no longer accepting comments.
I seriously doubt any American park chain wants peanuts. Unless universal really wants to replace toon lagoon or United feels like throwing a ton of theming out the window, Six Flags can bid pretty much whatever they want.