Monsters, Inc: Mike and Sulley to the Rescue reviews
Theme Park Insider readers offer their ratings and reviews for Monsters, Inc: Mike and Sulley to the Rescue, a dark ride in Hollywood Land at Disney's California Adventure.
Written by Robert Niles
"Monsters, Inc.: Mike and Sulley to the Rescue" opened in late December 2005 in the old "Superstar Limo" show building in the Hollywood Pictures Backlot section of Disney's California Adventure. Like its predecessor, Monsters, Inc. is a dark ride, but the similarity pretty much ends there.
This attraction offers a slow taxicab ride through the city of Monstropolis. Of course, something goes terribly wrong and we soon find that a - gasp! - human child is running loose in the city. Which should sound familiar to anyone who has seen the 2001 Pixar film upon which this ride is based. The ride breaks no new narrative ground, but encapsulates the animated hit with solid animatronic storytelling.
The cheesy figurines from Superstar Limo are long gone, replaced with Mike, Sulley, Randall Boggs, Roz and the toddler Boo, whom Mike and Sulley must return to her bedroom in the human world before Monstropolis' Child Detection Agency gets her. Toddlers will have fun trying to find the animatronic Boo in each scene, and the musical score and pleasant visuals will keep older kids and adults at least moderately entertained. Disney's Imagineers have thrown in a few treats, too: Breathe deep the aroma of ginger while driving through Harryhausen's sushi restaurant, for example.
Pretty much your standard dark ride. Cute themeing though. - Elia Juarez
I rate this commendable. The queue is great, the ride is great, and the scenes tell a great story. Though there really isn't much thrill involved, I would recommend this to anyone. The short lines make it even better, and the interactive Roz at the end of the ride is fun. - Carl Stovall
I struggle with this one. I rated it good because in quality and design, it's one of the best dark rides that Disney has. The problem is, and this may sound silly to many of you, but it doesn't really fit its surroundings. Disney just spent a billion dollars revamping its California Adventure park...and they did so beautifully. Carsland, World of Color, Buena Vista Street, the Red Car Trolly and the Paradise Pier makeover...all look fantastic. But still, we are supposed to be experiencing "1920's Hollywood" as the way Walt would have seen it and in the midst of this beautiful area...the gaudy, ill themed show building for Monster's just looks out of place. And based on the film and ride's story line, it IS out of place. To make matters worse for Monster's, now that Ariel has her own dark ride a few hundred yards away...and is MUCH better in design, appeal and theming, Monster's...like Muppets...is just an odd duck. For those of you that don't care about the theming and experience, Monsters is well done and top notch among its dark ride brothers and sisters. It is lightyears better than any of the Fantasyland attractions...but maybe it belongs there rather than in the turn of the century Hollywood section of the park? - Jeff Haslam
a good ride, my i think the Randall changing color scene is amazing and i also love the old lady monster at the end haha - daniel reyes
Don't go on if the wait is longer than 10 minutes. The ride feels cheap and now that the Little Mermaid attraction is open it makes Monsters Inc. look even worse. - Jeff Moon
Used to be a great dark ride, but along with the opening of Little Mermaid, now a pretty good dark ride at DCA. I enjoyed the little surprise this ride has to offer at every corner. The scent at the sushi shop, the mirror effect in the door room, the changing color of Randoll, and the interactive Roz at the end. As a Monsters Inc. fan I am content of the story of this ride presents on a scene-by-scene basis. It hasn't really cut out a chunk of the story so it turns up comprehensive and also enjoyable. The line is never long for this ride either, especially now during the ElecTRONica party going directly infront of the ride building, it is always zero wait time at night. The only down side of the ride is lacking of real animatronic. I really wish someday they will have an improvement of the ride that features higher technology, otherwise this attraction will only remain its quality as a dark ride you'd think it's ok to skip when you're at the park. - Jeremy Hu
A pretty good dark ride in the vein of many of the Fantasyland attractions. When the Little Mermaid opens in a few days, however, it's going to beat this dark ride in every imaginable way! - Tommy Nelson
Well, it's good for a dark ride, but don't expect to be "thrilled" - Reggie Templeton
Fun, but could be improved a lot by adding just a little more speed... - KJ Simpson
This is one of my favorite dark rides at the whole resort! I love the effects, smells, and details. The interactive Rawz animatronic is great! - Jay Finch
As good and as fun as most rides in fantasyland. Great for the whole family. Because it's in a bad corner of park that needs an e-ticket style attraction, it usually has no line except when the nearby Aladdin show lets out. - Erik Avila
Very much like a Fantasyland Dark ride! - Anthony Murphy
More attraction and restaurant ratings:
Theme Park Insider Guidebooks
Top U.S. Theme Parks
Walt Disney World's Magic Kingdom
Other Top International Parks
Readers' Top Themed Rides
Top Roller Coasters
Top Theme Park Shows
Features, News and Advice
2014 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar.
2013 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2012 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2011 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2010 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2009 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2008 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2007 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2006 Blog PostsJan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec.
2005 Blog PostsDec.
2004-2005Staff column archive